The current line number is supposed to be available on the pin
"motion.program-line" (not sure how well it always works).
There has to be a way to glean the total number of lines, but I don't know it.
- Original Message -
From: "Danny Miller"
To:
I was wondering if you could create an accurate estimate by creating a
sim config with (now just thinking out loud) 1000 times the
velocity/accelleraton and the feedrate override set to 1000%. You
would run the program in sim - then multiply the time by 1000. (or
whatever)
I have not
On 1 October 2016 at 22:49, wrote:
> OK, I know nothing about gear hobbing, but have seen that youtube video of
> the little hobber, what kind of work would need to be done to build a cnc
> version of such a machine?
It's actually almost trivial with HAL.
The estimator DOES just use distance & feedrate, not acceleration. This
is effective for estimating 2D cuts but junk for 3D carving, which
hinges primarily on acceleration.
There is no one effective "factor". I have 3D carvings which took 4x
longer than estimated, others 6x. If it is only a
OK, I know nothing about gear hobbing, but have seen that youtube video of the
little hobber, what kind of work would need to be done to build a cnc version
of such a machine?
- Original Message -
From: emc-users-requ...@lists.sourceforge.net
To: emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Hi Hubert
> Does anybody know what batteries a Renishaw MP3 IR probe with a round
> battery compartment uses. All the current literature shows a
> compartment with 2 9-volt batteries.
The OMP40 (and some other probes as well) uses two 1/2 AA 3.6V lithium
batteries. These batteries are about
I suppose you might be able to make something like that.
But I think I have a good idea for improving the run time estimator. Right now
how does it work, does it just use the feed rates X distance to be traveled?
What if it took that and added to it a factor(derived from the machines