On 6/29/21 12:57 PM, andy pugh wrote:
Yes, I read that, and is saddened me. But in more than just the
obvious way, because that means that some of us have been acting in a
way that upset Kirk, but if you asked us I would bet that not one of
us would think that we had.
I am not sure that a CoC
>I am not sure that a CoC is any help there, until Kirk said what he
>said I had always considered this mailing list to be friendly, and
>that I was already behaving according to the CoC.
I have not noticed any of the problems that Kirk mentioned, but maybe I'm
blind, too easy going, inclined
On Tue, 29 Jun 2021 at 19:47, Jeff Epler wrote:
> At the same time, it's good to be mindful of how the advice and help we
> give will be perceived; I think we should take to heart Kirk's message
> in this thread about toxic behavior. Kirk has been in this community a
> long time.
Yes, I read
On Tue, Jun 29, 2021 at 07:19:08PM +0100, andy pugh wrote:
> On Tue, 29 Jun 2021 at 16:39, andy pugh wrote:
>
> > I largely agree, apart from prohibiting "answering outside the scope
> > of the question"
>
> Thanks for reconsidering this clause, Seb.
I see a number of reasonable folks here
