On 03/28/2017 06:07 PM, andy pugh wrote:
> On 28 March 2017 at 23:54, MC Cason wrote:
>> I can envision a future where you see something on whatever
>> future version of the internet is, you order it, and it is built in your
>> home manufacturing unit. Instant
On 28 March 2017 at 23:54, MC Cason wrote:
> I can envision a future where you see something on whatever
> future version of the internet is, you order it, and it is built in your
> home manufacturing unit. Instant gratification at it's finest.
> However, a LOT of
On 03/28/2017 02:25 PM, Chris Albertson wrote:
> I see the argument as going like this
>
> One group says these 3d printers are worthless because they can't be used
> to make the stuff I am now making. For example "I can't print an exhaust
> valve for a diesel truck motor."
>
> The second group
I think the cake is a little bit funny and it also taste good but it is not the
best cake around.
On Tue, 28 Mar 2017 12:25:41 -0700
Chris Albertson wrote:
> I see the argument as going like this
>
> One group says these 3d printers are worthless because they can't
I see the argument as going like this
One group says these 3d printers are worthless because they can't be used
to make the stuff I am now making. For example "I can't print an exhaust
valve for a diesel truck motor."
The second group sees the printers and thinks about using it for new
> I have one that is very similar and I bought it pretty much out of
> curiosity. It sits in the corner of my office gathering dust. My
> experience with 3D printing was pretty underwhelming. It is very finicky
> and the results aren't that great. It gets pretty frustrating when
> something