Re: [Emc-users] Cincinnati arrow 500 retrofit running 2.6 revert back to 2.5.3?

2014-02-07 Thread Jon Elson
On 02/06/2014 11:48 PM, Pete Matos wrote: > My question is if I wanted to switch back to 2.5.3 > stable release how big of a pain in the ass is that gonna be LOL. One way is to install all the prerequisites to build from source, and then build a run-in-place version from source. This allows you

Re: [Emc-users] Cincinnati arrow 500 retrofit running 2.6 revert back to 2.5.3?

2014-02-07 Thread billy
He did install from a live cd. But I then upgraded him to a 2.6 version because I was planning on using remap for his toolchanger and I hasn't had any issues with the 2.6 I was using on my own machine. He might be better off just updating to the latest 2.6. On Feb 7, 2014, at 6:38 AM, sam sok

Re: [Emc-users] Cincinnati arrow 500 retrofit running 2.6 revert back to 2.5.3?

2014-02-07 Thread Sebastian Kuzminsky
On 2/6/14 22:48 , Pete Matos wrote: > Hey guys, > Been having some small problems with my machine in regards to the > offsets. It has been kind of difficult to get multi tool programs to run > with the correct offsets. At first I thought it was my misunderstanding of > the way it works but no

Re: [Emc-users] Cincinnati arrow 500 retrofit running 2.6 revert back to 2.5.3?

2014-02-07 Thread sam sokolik
Could you explain you issue? If there is a problem with offsets - it should be fixed (atleast start a bug tracker...) Also - didn't you install from the livecd? You could just run the installed version with your config and see what issue you come up with. sam On 02/06/2014 11:48 PM, Pete Mat

[Emc-users] Cincinnati arrow 500 retrofit running 2.6 revert back to 2.5.3?

2014-02-06 Thread Pete Matos
Hey guys, Been having some small problems with my machine in regards to the offsets. It has been kind of difficult to get multi tool programs to run with the correct offsets. At first I thought it was my misunderstanding of the way it works but now it appears it may be some kinda bug in this v