Re: [-empyre-] Creditism and Debt according to Richard Duncan

__**_ empyre forum empyre@lists.cofa.unsw.edu.au http://www.subtle.net/empyre -- Jon Lebkowsky (@jonl) Jon at Google+ https://plus.google.com/107989370857115020482/posts | Twitter http://twitter.com/jonl | LinkedInhttp://www.linkedin.com/in/jonlebkowsky | Facebook http://www.facebook.com

Re: [-empyre-] Hurricane Sandy

://www.alansondheim.org/**rq.txthttp://www.alansondheim.org/rq.txt == __**_ empyre forum empyre@lists.cofa.unsw.edu.au http://www.subtle.net/empyre -- Jon Lebkowsky (@jonl) Jon at Google+ https://plus.google.com/107989370857115020482/posts

Re: [-empyre-] The New Aesthetic - questions and conclusions

On 29 Sep 2012, at 13:47, Rob Myers wrote: On 09/28/2012 03:22 PM, Jon Lebkowsky wrote: I think NA so far is more acknowledgement than movement, more curation than active construction. What would it take to transform NA from passive to active force? Or does it make more sense to look

Re: [-empyre-] The New Aesthetic - questions and conclusions

I think NA so far is more acknowledgement than movement, more curation than active construction. What would it take to transform NA from passive to active force? Or does it make more sense to look for activist forces to emerge? Jon Lebkowsky Polycot Associates http://polycotassociates.com (Sent