sure to be there to assert other fantasies, to contribute to their limited
sensoria, to remind them of the walls against which they will hit, hopefully
before more people get hurt.
Kevin Hamilton
___
empyre forum
empyre@lists.cofa.unsw.edu.au
http
I've been reading this exchange with much interest, and am very
thankful to have seen some new voices here. We hardly need invited
guests to keep the momentum going, but I've been saving up my response
anyway.
So far I've been thinking about how untenable the strategic choices
are for
do some research and analysis on this - I am
too frightened:
http://www.cocacolazero.com/index.jsp#/facialprofiler/
Thanks, Sam.
On 10/12/2009, at 1:40 PM, Kevin Hamilton wrote:
Christina and all,
In any of the advertising for personal music devices or cell phones,
listeners
Thanks Renate, for inviting Christina and I to take the mic, and
thanks to Patty and company for the past week's prods to action and
thought.
Within the Hacktivating Design thread, Christina and I thought to
introduce the example of mis-use through humor and mistake, the
performed,
Thanks, Ricardo and all. I'm very happy to learn of the old CAE
project - I'd never come across that one! - and I'm also provoked by
Margarete's introduction of the pataphysical here.
But my concerns, triggered by Machiko's mention of how Chindogu have
been received in interaction design
of play
that doesn't reinforce a division between irrational-by-choice and
irrational-by-nature?
Thank you
Kevin Hamilton
On Nov 23, 2009, at 6:03 PM, Machiko Kusahara wrote:
Hi all,
As Renate introduced me in her email, I am currently in LA.
During the weekend as we cycled around in our
of design and arts education, I'm also looking to steer clear of
the technocratic, ahistorical progress machine of modern science
(sustainability as economic catalyst).
Any thoughts? Maybe a public listserv isn't the safest place to have
this conversation?
Kevin Hamilton
On Nov 20, 2009
