Hi Richard,
I kinda agree about Ryoji Ikeda. I've seen performances of his music, which
is usually generated via some synaesthetic process but rather than it being
purely generative it is heavily edited, composed, constructed for it's
aesthetic qualities. I love it!
The accompanying visuals are
I saw the Decode show. I think it is a good case in point here.
There were a small number of works that were conceptually and contextually
intriguing enough to demand more than a few seconds contemplation. Sadly
Golan Levin¹s piece was broken so I don¹t know if that was one of them. I
liked a
I'm hoping we can get Golan's piece working shortly. I'll let you
know. -- Helen
On Feb 23, 2010, at 9:12 AM, Simon Biggs wrote:
I saw the Decode show. I think it is a good case in point here.
There were a small number of works that were conceptually and
contextually intriguing enough
Surely though most visualisation is tweaked towards some form of
aesthetic
quality either for clarity of purpose/readability or 'wowing' an
audience
I once wrote that an effective data visualisation (in art and
science) was one that made the greatest possible distance between
human
Hi Richard, I am the guy that wants animations about love, hate, birth, sex, and
death.(not necessarily in that order)
your rules of engagement leave me a little cold. why would this be a goal?
greatest possible distance between
human senses and computer code that is achievable through the
