--empyre- soft-skinned space--Renate, I don't know that David or Johan were saying that social media is
evil as much as they were pointing out the tendency for people to soften
judgment of tools like Twitter because they have proven useful in this
instance or that
--empyre- soft-skinned space--
Hola Tod@s and David,
While the research and scholarship you present is extremely important to
consider
and to understand. It also assumes that artists and activist have no
critical awareness of these issues of power above all things or
--empyre- soft-skinned space--John, I am glad to read what you have written. I was feeling more and more
like a Luddite in my jaundiced view of social media, in my belief that the
power of this media is much more towards evil than good.
Ciao,
Murat
On Thu, Dec 11, 2014
--empyre- soft-skinned space--
Thank you, Ricardo. as also evidenced by the posts of Richard and Rahul this
week, it's the nuanced approach to social media of activist artists and
organizers that we have hoped to hear about this week. What you have taught us
over
--empyre- soft-skinned space--This is a great thread here. I think it is important, as David notes, we
conflate the efficacy of specific instances of use (this campaign or that
campaign) with the fact that it is really just a blank kind of power. What
I see more
--empyre- soft-skinned space--
Dear David, and John,
Your critiques of Ricardo's post seem unfair to me. Your claim that
all social media is problematic and that artists who work through
these platforms in a critical way seems to provide little leeway. The
point of an
--empyre- soft-skinned space--
On December 10, 2014 at 11:37:36 AM, David Golumbia (dgolum...@gmail.com) wrote:
power does not know social justice, however we construe that term. it is just
power.
On December 10, 2014 at 11:37:36 AM, David Golumbia
--empyre- soft-skinned space--On December 10, 2014 at 11:37:36 AM, David Golumbia (dgolum...@gmail.com) wrote:
power does not know social justice, however we construe that term. it is just
power.
On December 10, 2014 at 11:37:36 AM, David Golumbia (dgolum...@gmail.com)
--empyre- soft-skinned space--the obvious logical fallacy in celebrating the usefulness of social media
in campaigns for social justice is that what one is celebrating in practice
is the power of the communications medium to realize whatever we think
social justice is.
--empyre- soft-skinned space--
David, you make a fine point about the dangers of separating media, social
justice, and power. In making your closing distinction between
'advtertising' social media and 'scholarship,' perhaps you might like to
explain you scholarship on
--empyre- soft-skinned space--David's analysis equating electronic medium to power, rather than to
justice or freedom, is the point I was driving at also.
Murat
On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 11:04 AM, David Golumbia dgolum...@gmail.com
wrote:
--empyre- soft-skinned
--empyre- soft-skinned space--
I appreciate the focus on entanglements of social media and social
justice with power. Indeed, social media is being used by different
groups for different reasons as David and Tim note. Social media
itself as something very
--empyre- soft-skinned space--
I wanted to clarify that when I noted Also grounded activists rarely
have a technological bias in the earlier email, I may have sounded
ambivalent considering the next sentence. What I meant was Grounded
activists rarely are
13 matches
Mail list logo