Hi Mehaboob!
On Wed, 14 Apr 2021 17:21:49 -0700
J Decker wrote:
> If code can be run, it can be reverse engineered; just a matter of how much
> work one wants to put into it.
> If the code was compressed, and encrypted, then there'd still be a small
> bit code that has the decrypt, which can be
I have not found the answer to life, the universe and everything yet...
I created the hello.js based on Floh's code. I did one change in that I
added the "-s WASM=0" to the emcc command line to only produce JS and not
any WASM. (I assume that is ok for my goal.)
I added hello.js to my MS Code
If code can be run, it can be reverse engineered; just a matter of how much
work one wants to put into it.
If the code was compressed, and encrypted, then there'd still be a small
bit code that has the decrypt, which can be extracted to get the rest, etc.
Remote checking is a better option;
Thank you both for the quick responses.
Floh, I will try this today.
Geoffrey, I have tried your Generate Javascript Using MATLAB Coder add-on
in MATLAB, but ran into issues. I posted those issues on the conversation
that is on that add-on's page.
On Wednesday, April 14, 2021 at 5:13:16 AM
Hi Mehaboob,
No, Emscripten cannot compile native objects or archive files to
WebAssembly. Perhaps what you saw was a reference to archive files
containing WebAssembly objects produced by Emscripten?
Thomas
On Wed, Apr 14, 2021 at 12:45 Mehaboob kk wrote:
> Hello All,
>
> I see that
Hello All,
I see that Emscripton allows to compile .a files to wasm. In order for this
to work the .a file need to be originally compiled using gcc? if yes, any
specific version to be compatible?
Thanks,
Mehaboob
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Hello All,
Is there any technique to protect the WASM code from reverse engineering? I
have a licensed software which need to be protected. I am worried that the
reverse engineered code can be modified to bypass the license and compile
it back again
Any inputs please
Thanks,
Mehaboob
--
I'm not on Discord, just mention me in the ticket (floooh) and I'll be
there ;)
On Wednesday, 14 April 2021 at 18:45:57 UTC+2 s...@google.com wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 14, 2021 at 2:44 AM Floh wrote:
>
>> > Is there some reason you don't want to add the emscripten directory to
>> you PATH? Is
On Wed, Apr 14, 2021 at 2:44 AM Floh wrote:
> > Is there some reason you don't want to add the emscripten directory to
> you PATH? Is that somehow worse than setting EM_CONFIG and then parsing it?
>
> Because there isn't a single "emscripten directory", but one emscripten
> directory per
Hello,
You may want to look at:
https://www.mathworks.com/matlabcentral/fileexchange/69973-generate-javascript-using-matlab-coder
There is an update to be released soon that will resolve the issues shown
in the discussion. The existing add-on should work so long as you install
emscripten using
Hi, I quickly cobbled together a "simplest possible sample" for calling a C
function from JS here:
https://github.com/floooh/emsc-interop-demo
This is running in the browser though and it's a bit quick'n'dirty, but it
should get you started at least
for your own experimentations. The
> Is there some reason you don't want to add the emscripten directory to
you PATH? Is that somehow worse than setting EM_CONFIG and then parsing it?
Because there isn't a single "emscripten directory", but one emscripten
directory per "workspace directory". I might cd to a different workspace
On Tue, Apr 13, 2021 at 1:27 PM Floh wrote:
> Yeah, I never used python literals in EM_CONFIG, misunderstanding on my
> part :)
>
> About the other thing:
>
> > a) Use `which emcc` to find where emscripten is
>
> In my case, emcc is not in the path because this is a local installation
> (via
13 matches
Mail list logo
