Re: SIMD instructions not working with -O2

I've tried this in firefox nightly as well, which has 'window.SIMD' defined, but also no luck. Anyone can give me some insight in why this doesn't work? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "emscripten-discuss" group. To unsubscribe from this group and

emsdk missing Mac build of 1.37.35?

It's been a few days since 1.37.35 arrived through emsdk on Linux and Windows, but I'm still seeing only 1.37.34 as the latest on Mac. Is there a problem with this build, or is the build machinery stuck? Is there anything we can do to help? Thanks! -- brion -- You received this message because

Re: emsdk missing Mac build of 1.37.35?

Yeah, looks like the mac bot is failing to build, sorry about this. The larger issue is that juj won't be working much on this anymore, and I've been trying to keep the buildbots running. They are now at http://ec2-54-213-252-128.us-west-2.compute.amazonaws.com:8112/#/ The current test status

Re: Implementing own file system: passing back large int64_t values (>2 GB) in lseek, fstat & friends

It's probably something customizable in musl, since it can run in 32 and 64 bit systems. Probably for emscripten we defined it as 32-bit since memory is 32-bit anyhow. So if you want to change this, just defining it as 64-bit and fixing up the syscalls would be enough. Do you really use files

Re: emsdk missing Mac build of 1.37.35?

On Mon, Mar 5, 2018 at 3:22 PM, Alon Zakai wrote: > The mac builder bot now reports it succeeded, and if I am reading things > right the files appear to be uploaded where the emsdk can get them. Does it > work now? > Confirmed I can now install sdk-1.37.35-64bit binaries on

Re: Implementing own file system: passing back large int64_t values (>2 GB) in lseek, fstat & friends

Nah, we read these files progressively. ;-) On Tue, Mar 6, 2018 at 6:45 AM, Alon Zakai wrote: > It's probably something customizable in musl, since it can run in 32 and > 64 bit systems. Probably for emscripten we defined it as 32-bit since > memory is 32-bit anyhow. So if

Re: emsdk missing Mac build of 1.37.35?

The mac builder bot now reports it succeeded, and if I am reading things right the files appear to be uploaded where the emsdk can get them. Does it work now? On Mon, Mar 5, 2018 at 12:34 PM, Alon Zakai wrote: > Yeah, looks like the mac bot is failing to build, sorry about

Re: Emscripten::val binary operator in embind

So first of all, I'd say you're not going to want to use val for anything remotely performance sensitive. There's a lot of overhead marshalling values back and forth. Directly to your point, val can represent any javascript value, including those for which comparator operators don't make

Re: emsdk missing Mac build of 1.37.35?

> On Mar 6, 2018, at 8:32, Brion Vibber wrote: > > Virtualization of macOS is a licensing difficulty so you pretty much need a > physical Mac somewhere… Travis CI seems to manage though you’ll have the problem Alon alluded to, which is, as an open source project, you have