Re: [Emu] Results of consensus call on tunnel method document

2011-05-14 Thread Alan DeKok
Glen Zorn wrote: There seem to be two issues here: renaming the draft allocating a new EAP type. For which one are opinions being solicited? Allocating a new EAP type. The draft name eap-tunnel-method describes the protocol accurately. Alan DeKok.

Re: [Emu] Results of consensus call on tunnel method document

2011-05-14 Thread Dan Harkins
My opinion is we request allocation of a new EAP method value. And I suggest that the new EAP method have a name/description of Extensible Tunneled Authentication (ETA). Dan. On Fri, May 13, 2011 8:29 am, Alan DeKok wrote: Since we have reached WG consensus on the method, can the authors

Re: [Emu] Results of consensus call on tunnel method document

2011-05-14 Thread Sam Hartman
Alan == Alan DeKok al...@deployingradius.com writes: Alan Glen Zorn wrote: There seem to be two issues here: renaming the draft allocating a new EAP type. For which one are opinions being solicited? Alan Allocating a new EAP type. My opinion is that we have two options:

Re: [Emu] Results of consensus call on tunnel method document

2011-05-14 Thread Dan Harkins
On Sat, May 14, 2011 1:58 pm, Alan DeKok wrote: Dan Harkins wrote: My opinion is we request allocation of a new EAP method value. And I suggest that the new EAP method have a name/description of Extensible Tunneled Authentication (ETA). I'd like to know more about the pros and cons.

Re: [Emu] Results of consensus call on tunnel method document

2011-05-14 Thread Glen Zorn
On 5/15/2011 2:36 AM, Sam Hartman wrote: Alan == Alan DeKok al...@deployingradius.com writes: Alan Glen Zorn wrote: There seem to be two issues here: renaming the draft allocating a new EAP type. For which one are opinions being solicited? Alan Allocating a new EAP