Jim:
Your comments were on draft-ietf-emu-crypto-bind-00.txt, not
draft-ietf-emu-eap-tunnel-method?
On 9/26/12 12:10 AM, Jim Schaad i...@augustcellars.com wrote:
Version 0 of the document is not ready for a last call as security
considerations are missing.
Other comments
1. I think in
As was pointed out to me, the subject message on the message had the wrong
draft name (even if the version number was right).
I am re-posting so that searches on the subject will find the correct
document for comments.
Jim
-Original Message-
From: emu-boun...@ietf.org
1. In section 3.2.3, it says that a new PAC can be requested after a full
TLS handshake. Can one be requested following an abbreviated handshake? Or
do you just re-use the existing PAC?
2. Section 3.3 s/descried/described/
3. Section 3.4 - Is it possible to have multiple server ids after
