[Emu] Barry Leiba's No Objection on draft-ietf-emu-eap-session-id-04: (with COMMENT)

2020-06-02 Thread Barry Leiba via Datatracker
Barry Leiba has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-emu-eap-session-id-04: No Objection When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to

Re: [Emu] jovergar review of draft-dekok-emu-tls-eap-types-02

2020-06-02 Thread Jorge Vergara
-Original Message- From: Alan DeKok Sent: Tuesday, June 2, 2020 6:09 AM To: Jorge Vergara Cc: EMU WG Subject: Re: [Emu] jovergar review of draft-dekok-emu-tls-eap-types-02 On Jun 2, 2020, at 3:29 AM, Jorge Vergara wrote: >> >> I’ve attempted/completed a prototype implementation o

Re: [Emu] jovergar review of draft-dekok-emu-tls-eap-types-02

2020-06-02 Thread Alan DeKok
On Jun 2, 2020, at 3:29 AM, Jorge Vergara wrote: > > I’ve attempted/completed a prototype implementation of EAP-TLS, PEAP, > EAP-TTLS, and TEAP clients using TLS 1.3. EAP-TLS went smoothly so this boils > down to a review of the subject line document which addresses the rest of the > EAP typ

[Emu] jovergar review of draft-dekok-emu-tls-eap-types-02

2020-06-02 Thread Jorge Vergara
Hi all, I've attempted/completed a prototype implementation of EAP-TLS, PEAP, EAP-TTLS, and TEAP clients using TLS 1.3. EAP-TLS went smoothly so this boils down to a review of the subject line document which addresses the rest of the EAP types. I am not necessarily an expert on all of TLS 1.3 s