Re: [Emu] Working group Last Call for RFC 7170bis

2023-03-25 Thread Eliot Lear
On 25.03.23 14:28, Alexander Clouter wrote: On Sat, 25 Mar 2023, at 12:03, Eliot Lear wrote: I ask that as you consider this thread, you think beyond Basic-Auth to the PKCS operations. I definitely am not qualified to think on this, I would be a fool to not yield to those using those

Re: [Emu] Working group Last Call for RFC 7170bis

2023-03-25 Thread Alexander Clouter
On Sat, 25 Mar 2023, at 12:03, Eliot Lear wrote: > I ask that as you consider this thread, you think beyond Basic-Auth to the > PKCS operations. > I definitely am not qualified to think on this, I would be a fool to not yield to those using those attributes! Other than your group, is anyone

Re: [Emu] Working group Last Call for RFC 7170bis

2023-03-25 Thread Eliot Lear
I ask that as you consider this thread, you think beyond Basic-Auth to the PKCS operations.  Those are becoming really important to our base. Eliot On 25.03.23 09:52, Alexander Clouter wrote: On Sat, 25 Mar 2023, at 01:08, Heikki Vatiainen wrote: If you are using eapol_test prior to a

Re: [Emu] Working group Last Call for RFC 7170bis

2023-03-25 Thread Alexander Clouter
On Sat, 25 Mar 2023, at 01:08, Heikki Vatiainen wrote: >>> If you are using eapol_test prior to a few TEAP patches (reversed EAP-FAST >>> MSK calculation and ordering of the Cryptobinding processing) then it >>> should just work out the box. > I think the case in question where the inner methods