@ietf.org; draft-ietf-emu-eap-tunnel-
met...@tools.ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Emu] More comments for eap-tunnel-method
That is the current thinking, and the only concrete use case for Outer
TLV
now is in the 1st message from server to peer with no TLS data. I am ok
with
adding another optional
...@tools.ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Emu] More comments for eap-tunnel-method
Jim:
Thanks for the review. Please see my comments below.
On 9/30/12 2:01 PM, Jim Schaad i...@augustcellars.com wrote:
1. Should the Message Length field be present if the TLS Data field is
absent?
[HZ] According
09, 2012 11:43 AM
To: Jim Schaad; emu@ietf.org; draft-ietf-emu-eap-tunnel-
met...@tools.ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Emu] More comments for eap-tunnel-method
Jim:
Please see comments inline below.
On 10/8/12 1:11 AM, Jim Schaad i...@augustcellars.com wrote:
-Original Message
@ietf.org; draft-ietf-emu-eap-tunnel-
met...@tools.ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Emu] More comments for eap-tunnel-method
Jim:
Please see comments inline below.
On 10/8/12 1:11 AM, Jim Schaad i...@augustcellars.com wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Hao Zhou (hzhou) [mailto:hz
-Original Message-
From: Hao Zhou (hzhou) [mailto:hz...@cisco.com]
Sent: Tuesday, October 09, 2012 12:46 PM
To: Jim Schaad; emu@ietf.org; draft-ietf-emu-eap-tunnel-
met...@tools.ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Emu] More comments for eap-tunnel-method
That is the current thinking
-Original Message-
From: Hao Zhou (hzhou) [mailto:hz...@cisco.com]
Sent: Thursday, October 04, 2012 2:56 PM
To: Jim Schaad; emu@ietf.org; draft-ietf-emu-eap-tunnel-
met...@tools.ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Emu] More comments for eap-tunnel-method
Jim:
Thanks for the review. Please
Jim:
Thanks for the review. Please see my comments below.
On 9/30/12 2:01 PM, Jim Schaad i...@augustcellars.com wrote:
1. Should the Message Length field be present if the TLS Data field is
absent?
[HZ] According to the text in the draft, the message length field should
only be present if the
1. Should the Message Length field be present if the TLS Data field is
absent?
2. There is nothing to say which TLVs can and cannot occur in the Outer
TLVs in any easily findable method. Either a table or the string outer in
descriptions would be helpful. As an example, does the Authority-ID