Re: [Emu] Proposed resolution for TEAP errata 5765

2020-11-01 Thread Joseph Salowey
On Fri, Oct 23, 2020 at 9:20 AM Jouni Malinen wrote: > On Thu, Oct 22, 2020 at 05:44:33PM +0300, Oleg Pekar wrote: > > The Authority-ID TLV is used by the client to identify the TEAP server it > > is talking to. If the same client talks to more than one TEAP server - it > > can keep PACs or

Re: [Emu] Proposed resolution for TEAP errata 5765

2020-10-23 Thread Jouni Malinen
On Thu, Oct 22, 2020 at 05:44:33PM +0300, Oleg Pekar wrote: > The Authority-ID TLV is used by the client to identify the TEAP server it > is talking to. If the same client talks to more than one TEAP server - it > can keep PACs or cached data from all of them identified by > the Authority-ID. If

Re: [Emu] Proposed resolution for TEAP errata 5765

2020-10-22 Thread Oleg Pekar
The Authority-ID TLV is used by the client to identify the TEAP server it is talking to. If the same client talks to more than one TEAP server - it can keep PACs or cached data from all of them identified by the Authority-ID. If we make it optional in TEAP start message but keep mandatory in

[Emu] Proposed resolution for TEAP errata 5765

2020-10-21 Thread Joseph Salowey
Errata 5765: https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid5765 Proposed Status: Verified Revision: (unmodified from original posting) Section 4.2.2 says: M Mandatory, set to one (1) It should say: M 0 (Optional) Notes: Authority-ID TLV is used only as an Outer TLV (in TEAP/Start)