1. Should the Message Length field be present if the TLS Data field is absent?
2. There is nothing to say which TLVs can and cannot occur in the Outer TLVs in any easily findable method. Either a table or the string outer in descriptions would be helpful. As an example, does the Authority-ID TLV in the outer TLV make sense? 3. I have gone through the fragmentation and did an implementation rather than just reading it. The questions that I have on it now are slightly different. Do TLVs need to be on a fragment boundary? Or do we just build the entire message, fragment it into convenient sizes regardless of the actual content of the message contents and sent the pieces across? If so then the text should probably be re-written to be clearer. Specifically, the message length is not useful for allocating the buffer on the first round trip of messages where one can have a TLV added in to the content. _______________________________________________ Emu mailing list Emu@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/emu
