Re: [Emu] WGLC completed for for draft-ietf-emu-eap-tls13-05

2019-07-28 Thread Alan DeKok
On Jul 28, 2019, at 5:09 PM, Jim Schaad wrote: > > I cannot speak to PEAP, but it would seem that TEAP might need this feature > as, at least on resumption, it is totally optional for both sides to use any > TLVs an thus the same issue might be present. TTLS seems to always require > that the

Re: [Emu] WGLC completed for for draft-ietf-emu-eap-tls13-05

2019-07-28 Thread Jim Schaad
I cannot speak to PEAP, but it would seem that TEAP might need this feature as, at least on resumption, it is totally optional for both sides to use any TLVs an thus the same issue might be present. TTLS seems to always require that the client send a AVP, but I am not sure that it is required for

Re: [Emu] WGLC completed for for draft-ietf-emu-eap-tls13-05

2019-07-28 Thread Jouni Malinen
On Thu, Jul 25, 2019 at 10:49:40AM +, John Mattsson wrote: > Question: How will the use of Application data with TLSPlaintext.fragment = > 0x00 work with EAP-TTLS, PEAP, and TEAP when they start using TLS 1.3? I > assume they will need to send the same 0x00 to commit to not sending any more