On Mon, Jun 29, 2020 at 6:49 AM Oleg Pekar
wrote:
> Jorge, Joe, thank you for your comments. So the updated proposal should be:
>
> 1) In Section "4.2.13. Crypto-Binding TLV" make "EMSK Compound MAC" and
> "MSK Compound MAC" fields variable length depending on the number of output
> bits of the
Joe, nice proposal. Few questions:
1. We have a case of Basic Password Authentication instead of inner method
thus we should also use Crypto-Binding TLV based on Zero-MSK after it
2. As Eliot mentioned, we have a case of no inner method at all - we should
use Crypto-Binding TLV based on Zero-MSK af
Jorge, thanks for correction: Intermediate-Result TLV must be sent at the
end of Basic Password Authentication. I think we also need to list all four
inner method cases that I mention in above explicitly, for example in
"3.3.3. Protected Termination and Acknowledged Result Indication" section.
Si
Jorge, Joe, thank you for your comments. So the updated proposal should be:
1) In Section "4.2.13. Crypto-Binding TLV" make "EMSK Compound MAC" and
"MSK Compound MAC" fields variable length depending on the number of output
bits of the MAC function negotiated by TLS protocol. A field "Compound MA
