On Mon, Jan 4, 2021, at 17:18, Joseph Salowey wrote:
> [Joe] I'm not sure I remember correctly, but I think the commitment
> message was to make the integration with EAP statement machine cleaner
> and perhaps to future proof against additional messages sent after the
> handshake. I tend to
Hi Martin,
Thanks for taking a look at this, some comments below:
On Sun, Jan 3, 2021 at 7:45 PM Martin Thomson wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> Ben asked me to take a look at this draft and I think that the general
> gist of Ben's comments need some careful consideration.
>
> # Commitment Message
>
> I
Hi All,
Ben asked me to take a look at this draft and I think that the general gist of
Ben's comments need some careful consideration.
# Commitment Message
I think that Ben's concerns about the Commitment Message are justified, but
aren't as bad a layering violation as observed (almost). It
