On Jan 27, 2021, at 3:25 PM, Joseph Salowey wrote:
> [Joe] It seems that resumption would help in the case that large certificates
> cause multiple round trips. Do you have an idea of how widespread resumption
> use is in current EAP-TLS implementations?
It's common. Perhaps not ubiquitous,
On Wed, Jan 27, 2021 at 7:17 AM Alan DeKok
wrote:
> On Jan 27, 2021, at 10:09 AM, John Mattsson 40ericsson@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:
> >
> > Looking at the GitHub version after the latest changes. I don't think
> the tradeoffs make sense anymore.
> >
> > - Full handshake is now 4.5 round-trips
On Jan 27, 2021, at 10:09 AM, John Mattsson
wrote:
>
> Looking at the GitHub version after the latest changes. I don't think the
> tradeoffs make sense anymore.
>
> - Full handshake is now 4.5 round-trips
Does that account for large / long certificate chains?
> - Resumption is now 4.5 roun
Hi,
Looking at the GitHub version after the latest changes. I don't think the
tradeoffs make sense anymore.
- Full handshake is now 4.5 round-trips
- Resumption is now 4.5 round-trips.
This does not seem like a good tradeoff or optimization at all. If we instead
skipped Resumption, the full h
