On Mar 26, 2022, at 12:01 PM, Michael Richardson wrote:
> 64K is plenty to run RFC8995. Probably we can get away with a total of less
> than 10K exchanged in the worst case situations, with 2K being more typical.
That's good, but I still have concerns with the process of using EAP for,
well,
On Mar 26, 2022, at 11:57 AM, Michael Richardson wrote:
> I'm gonna quibble with your choice of terms, because there has been some
> progress/convergence in the terminology. This is good news, because sharing
> terminology is an important leap forward.
That's good.
>> reconfiguration - how do
