Re: [Emu] BRSKI-TEAP vs regular connection (was Re: EAP questions ...)

2020-01-16 Thread Michael Richardson
Eliot Lear (elear) wrote: >> On 15 Jan 2020, at 16:10, Michael Richardson wrote: >> >> >> Eliot Lear (elear) wrote: Owen, do we have a need to recognize that a device needs to perform onboarding again after a movement? i.e. device A enrolls o

Re: [Emu] BRSKI-TEAP vs regular connection (was Re: EAP questions ...)

2020-01-15 Thread Eliot Lear (elear)
> On 15 Jan 2020, at 16:10, Michael Richardson wrote: > > > Eliot Lear (elear) wrote: >>> Owen, do we have a need to recognize that a device needs to perform >>> onboarding again after a movement? >>> >>> i.e. device A enrolls on network 1, gets an LDevID usable on network >>> 1, uses that w

Re: [Emu] BRSKI-TEAP vs regular connection (was Re: EAP questions ...)

2020-01-15 Thread Michael Richardson
Eliot Lear (elear) wrote: >> Owen, do we have a need to recognize that a device needs to perform >> onboarding again after a movement? >> >> i.e. device A enrolls on network 1, gets an LDevID usable on network >> 1, uses that with EAP-FOOBAR. >> >> device A then is mov

Re: [Emu] BRSKI-TEAP vs regular connection (was Re: EAP questions ...)

2020-01-15 Thread Eliot Lear (elear)
Hi Michael, > > Owen, do we have a need to recognize that a device needs to perform > onboarding again after a movement? > > i.e. device A enrolls on network 1, gets an LDevID usable on network 1, > uses that with EAP-FOOBAR. > > device A then is moved to network 2, it tries to use same LDevID