Re: [Emu] AD review of draft-ietf-emu-rfc5448bis-06

2020-03-09 Thread Jari Arkko
-06.diff.html> Here are the responses to your comments: > I conducted an AD review of draft-ietf-emu-rfc5448bis-06 and this document is > in good shape. Thanks for all of the work on it. I have minor questions and > editorial nits which can be addressed with the IETF Last Call feedb

Re: [Emu] AD review of draft-ietf-emu-rfc5448bis-06

2020-01-15 Thread Joseph Salowey
On Wed, Jan 15, 2020 at 2:24 PM Roman Danyliw wrote: > Hello! > > I conducted an AD review of draft-ietf-emu-rfc5448bis-06 and this document > is in good shape. Thanks for all of the work on it. I have minor > questions and editorial nits which can be addressed with the

[Emu] AD review of draft-ietf-emu-rfc5448bis-06

2020-01-15 Thread Roman Danyliw
Hello! I conducted an AD review of draft-ietf-emu-rfc5448bis-06 and this document is in good shape. Thanks for all of the work on it. I have minor questions and editorial nits which can be addressed with the IETF Last Call feedback. Minor: -- Can you revisit the history -- why was RFC4187