[Christian, read down a ways]
On 22.10.18 20:15, Michael Richardson wrote:
> Eliot, thanks for this document. If nothing else, it means that
> we BRSKI authors can deal with some review comments by pointing to "future
> work" :-)
>
> (A)"request-voucher-with-possession" <-- what about intent to
Eliot, thanks for this document. If nothing else, it means that
we BRSKI authors can deal with some review comments by pointing to "future
work" :-)
(A)"request-voucher-with-possession" <-- what about intent to traffic? :-)
(for those that don't get the joke:
As promised, here is a draft that attempts to wangle BRSKI to allow for
proof of possession tests. This is very early work and intended for
discussion at this point during OPSAWG and at the side meeting we have
scheduled for Tuesday night. If people like what they see, we can
discuss in more
