Re: [Emu] More comments for eap-tunnel-method

2012-10-10 Thread Hao Zhou (hzhou)
ay, October 09, 2012 12:46 PM >> To: Jim Schaad; emu@ietf.org; draft-ietf-emu-eap-tunnel- >> met...@tools.ietf.org >> Subject: Re: [Emu] More comments for eap-tunnel-method >> >> That is the current thinking, and the only concrete use case for Outer >>TLV >> n

Re: [Emu] More comments for eap-tunnel-method

2012-10-09 Thread Jim Schaad
> -Original Message- > From: Hao Zhou (hzhou) [mailto:hz...@cisco.com] > Sent: Tuesday, October 09, 2012 12:46 PM > To: Jim Schaad; emu@ietf.org; draft-ietf-emu-eap-tunnel- > met...@tools.ietf.org > Subject: Re: [Emu] More comments for eap-tunnel-method > > That

Re: [Emu] More comments for eap-tunnel-method

2012-10-09 Thread Hao Zhou (hzhou)
ay, October 09, 2012 11:43 AM >> To: Jim Schaad; emu@ietf.org; draft-ietf-emu-eap-tunnel- >> met...@tools.ietf.org >> Subject: Re: [Emu] More comments for eap-tunnel-method >> >> Jim: >> >> Please see comments inline below. >> >> On 10/8/1

Re: [Emu] More comments for eap-tunnel-method

2012-10-09 Thread Jim Schaad
: Tuesday, October 09, 2012 11:43 AM > To: Jim Schaad; emu@ietf.org; draft-ietf-emu-eap-tunnel- > met...@tools.ietf.org > Subject: Re: [Emu] More comments for eap-tunnel-method > > Jim: > > Please see comments inline below. > > On 10/8/12 1:11 AM, "Jim Schaad"

Re: [Emu] More comments for eap-tunnel-method

2012-10-09 Thread Hao Zhou (hzhou)
emu-eap-tunnel- >> met...@tools.ietf.org >> Subject: Re: [Emu] More comments for eap-tunnel-method >> >> Jim: >> >> Thanks for the review. Please see my comments below. >> >> On 9/30/12 2:01 PM, "Jim Schaad" wrote: >> >> >

Re: [Emu] More comments for eap-tunnel-method

2012-10-07 Thread Jim Schaad
> -Original Message- > From: Hao Zhou (hzhou) [mailto:hz...@cisco.com] > Sent: Thursday, October 04, 2012 2:56 PM > To: Jim Schaad; emu@ietf.org; draft-ietf-emu-eap-tunnel- > met...@tools.ietf.org > Subject: Re: [Emu] More comments for eap-tunnel-method > >

Re: [Emu] More comments for eap-tunnel-method

2012-10-04 Thread Hao Zhou (hzhou)
Jim: Thanks for the review. Please see my comments below. On 9/30/12 2:01 PM, "Jim Schaad" wrote: >1. Should the Message Length field be present if the TLS Data field is >absent? [HZ] According to the text in the draft, the message length field should only be present if the L bit is set, usual

[Emu] More comments for eap-tunnel-method

2012-09-30 Thread Jim Schaad
1. Should the Message Length field be present if the TLS Data field is absent? 2. There is nothing to say which TLVs can and cannot occur in the Outer TLVs in any easily findable method. Either a table or the string outer in descriptions would be helpful. As an example, does the Authority-ID