On Fri, Oct 11, 2019 at 7:34 AM Eliot Lear <l...@cisco.com> wrote: > > > > On 11 Oct 2019, at 16:09, Michael Richardson <m...@sandelman.ca> wrote: > > > > So, can wired just be a degenerate version of wifi, where there can be > only > > one "ESSID", and there are no beacons to consider? > > > On the whole that has been my thought. But it is a matter of which > mechanism to degenerate to. Is it TLS-PSK? eDPP++? TLS with naked public > keys++? And again, this is the on-prem case. For cloud, we are well along. >
[Joe] We are currently in a holding pattern with EAP-TLS. It does not seem right to delay it for functionality that we are not sure we have a use case for. If a use case develops then we can publish an update to EAP-TLS 1.3. Do we have a use case for EAP-TLS-PSK that is blocked in the current situation? > Eliot >
_______________________________________________ Emu mailing list Emu@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/emu
