On Nov 7, 2019, at 12:30 PM, Owen Friel (ofriel) wrote:
> [ofriel] TLS1.3 explicitly does not allow both PSK and certs simultaneously.
> draft-ietf-tls-tls13-cert-with-extern-psk does, but that’s Experimental. I
> don't think TLS with extern PSK is really intended for Web/Browser HTTPS
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Emu On Behalf Of Joseph Salowey
> Sent: 31 October 2019 04:45
> To: Alan DeKok
> Cc: draft-ietf-emu-eap-tl...@ietf.org; John Mattsson
> ; Michael Richardson
> ; EMU WG
> Subject: Re: [Emu] POST WGLC Comments draft-ietf-emu-eap-tls13
>
>
>
> On Wed, Oct
On Nov 7, 2019, at 12:30 PM, Owen Friel (ofriel) wrote:
>> [Joe] Is EAP Identity Synonymous with the NAI?
>
> [ofriel] I'd also like to definitively understand this. Neither RFC3748 or
> RFC7542 are clear on this. Should this be an errata to clarify.. somewhere?
The EAP Identity can largely
> -Original Message-
> From: Emu On Behalf Of Joseph Salowey
> Sent: 03 November 2019 18:31
> To: Alan DeKok
> Cc: draft-ietf-emu-eap-tl...@ietf.org; EMU WG ; John
> Mattsson ; Michael
> Richardson
> Subject: Re: [Emu] POST WGLC Comments draft-ietf-emu-eap-tls13
>
>
> On Fri, Nov 1,
> -Original Message-
> From: Emu On Behalf Of Alan DeKok
> Sent: 01 November 2019 11:08
> To: John Mattsson
> Cc: draft-ietf-emu-eap-tl...@ietf.org; Michael Richardson
> ; John Mattsson
> ; EMU WG
> Subject: Re: [Emu] POST WGLC Comments draft-ietf-emu-eap-tls13
>
> On Nov 1, 2019,
On Nov 7, 2019, at 12:30 PM, Owen Friel (ofriel) wrote:
>
>
> [ofriel] Question to the WG: should the TEAP changes for TLS1.3 be included
> in draft-dekok-emu-tls-eap-types?
If they're minor, it may be OK.
> Or in draft-lear-eap-teap-brski - and note that the title is changed to "
> TEAP
On 2019-11-07 12:43 p.m., Alan DeKok wrote:
>> E.g. we have documented in
>> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-lear-eap-teap-brski-05#section-5 that:
>>
>> " A device that has not been bootstrapped at all SHOULD send an
>> identity of teap-bootstrap@TBD1. "
>>
>> If we register that
