The latest version of the EAP-NOOB draft has only editorial changes. Many are
based on Daniel Migault's review, which was very helpful in spotting
potentially confusing text bits. Some terminology questions may need further
discussion. The length of the PeerId requires a detailed analysis,
Hi,
- The new version should address all the received comments from Alan and Russ
regarding EAP, TLS, and Certificate identities.
- New section on identities early in the document discussing identities and
pointing to other sections discussing identities.
- More information given on why
Thanks for the pointer.
I am fine with the proposed way forward.
Russ
> On Mar 10, 2020, at 12:43 PM, Mohit Sethi M
> wrote:
>
> Hi Russ,
>
> You can listen here: https://youtu.be/YJLG4JUftqI?t=1144
>
> We plan to support it in EAP-TLS-PSK instead:
>
I do not understand the reason for Bernard's objection. I looked at the
minutes, and I do not find any rationale there. Can you help?
Russ
> On Mar 9, 2020, at 5:59 AM, John Mattsson wrote:
>
> Hi Russ,
>
> Sorry for the late reply. I actually brought up your draft
>
Hi Russ,
You can listen here: https://youtu.be/YJLG4JUftqI?t=1144
We plan to support it in EAP-TLS-PSK instead:
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-mattsson-emu-eap-tls-psk-00. We have
already added a reference to draft-ietf-tls-tls13-cert-with-extern-psk
and plan to use it. I think using an
