[Emu] Feedback on Salted EAP draft

Hello, Dan Harkin's asked that I AD sponsor the following draft: https://www.iab.org/activities/workshops/caris/ I'm considering it, reviews and opinions are welcome. Thank you. -- Best regards, Kathleen ___ Emu mailing list Emu@ietf.org https://www

Re: [Emu] Feedback on Salted EAP draft

I meant to send the link to Dan's draft: https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-harkins-salted-eap-pwd-01 Long week... On Fri, Mar 27, 2015 at 1:17 PM, Kathleen Moriarty < kathleen.moriarty.i...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hello, > > Dan Harkin's asked that I AD sponsor the

Re: [Emu] [saag] Feedback on Salted EAP draft

, 2015 at 1:34 PM, Sam Hartman wrote: > >>>>> "Kathleen" == Kathleen Moriarty > writes: > > Kathleen>I meant to send the link to Dan's draft: > Kathleen> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-harkins-salted-eap-pwd-01 > Kathleen>

[Emu] Kathleen Moriarty's Yes on charter-ietf-emu-04-00: (with COMMENT)

Kathleen Moriarty has entered the following ballot position for charter-ietf-emu-04-00: Yes When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) The document, along with

Re: [Emu] Ben Campbell's No Objection on charter-ietf-emu-04-00: (with COMMENT)

Thank you Ben and Jari. The updates will appear shortly int he new version. Best regards, Kathleen On Sun, Feb 18, 2018 at 12:32 PM, Ben Campbell wrote: > Thanks, Jari, this all looks good to me. > > Ben. > >> On Feb 18, 2018, at 5:46 AM, Jari Arkko wrote: >> >> Hi Ben, >> >> And thanks for yo

Re: [Emu] Spencer Dawkins' No Objection on charter-ietf-emu-04-00: (with COMMENT)

Thank you Jari and Spencer. The update will appear shortly in the new version. On Sun, Feb 18, 2018 at 6:51 AM, Jari Arkko wrote: > >> "This working group has been chartered to provide updates to some >> commonly used EAP method." >> >> really singular? Or should it be "commonly used EAP methods

Re: [Emu] Kathleen Moriarty's Yes on charter-ietf-emu-04-00: (with COMMENT)

Thank you, Jari. The milestones have been updated. Best regards, Kathleen On Sun, Feb 18, 2018 at 6:25 AM, Jari Arkko wrote: > Mohit, Kathleen, > > I’d suggest editing the current milestones as follows. The edit and schedule > suggestions are based in part on what I think the 3GPP schedules are

Re: [Emu] Mirja Kühlewind's No Objection on charter-ietf-emu-04-00: (with COMMENT)

Mirja, The milestones have been updated per the dates and language provided by Jari. Thanks, Kathleen On Mon, Feb 19, 2018 at 11:36 AM, Mirja Kuehlewind (IETF) wrote: > Yes. I don’t see a big difference between „WGLC" and "send to IESG“ but it’s > good to have a deadline! > >> Am 18.02.2018 um

Re: [Emu] Eric Rescorla's Yes on charter-ietf-emu-04-01: (with COMMENT)

Hi Eric, On Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 11:55 PM, Eric Rescorla wrote: > Eric Rescorla has entered the following ballot position for > charter-ietf-emu-04-01: Yes > > When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all > email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cu

Re: [Emu] [TLS] Last Call: (Deprecating TLSv1.0 and TLSv1.1) to Best Current Practice

Hi Eliot, Thanks for raising your concern. I’ll note that I first started working on this because a well deployed library already had plans to drop support for versions 1.0 and 1.1 in their next release. Customers that wanted those versions would have to use a prior library. This history may