Re: [Emu] BRSKI-TEAP vs regular connection (was Re: EAP questions ...)

2020-01-16 Thread Michael Richardson
Eliot Lear (elear) wrote: >> On 15 Jan 2020, at 16:10, Michael Richardson wrote: >> >> >> Eliot Lear (elear) wrote: Owen, do we have a need to recognize that a device needs to perform onboarding again after a movement? i.e. device A enrolls

Re: [Emu] BRSKI-TEAP vs regular connection (was Re: EAP questions ...)

2020-01-15 Thread Eliot Lear (elear)
> On 15 Jan 2020, at 16:10, Michael Richardson wrote: > > > Eliot Lear (elear) wrote: >>> Owen, do we have a need to recognize that a device needs to perform >>> onboarding again after a movement? >>> >>> i.e. device A enrolls on network 1, gets an LDevID usable on network >>> 1, uses that

Re: [Emu] BRSKI-TEAP vs regular connection (was Re: EAP questions ...)

2020-01-15 Thread Michael Richardson
Eliot Lear (elear) wrote: >> Owen, do we have a need to recognize that a device needs to perform >> onboarding again after a movement? >> >> i.e. device A enrolls on network 1, gets an LDevID usable on network >> 1, uses that with EAP-FOOBAR. >> >> device A then is

Re: [Emu] BRSKI-TEAP vs regular connection (was Re: EAP questions ...)

2020-01-15 Thread Eliot Lear (elear)
Hi Michael, > > Owen, do we have a need to recognize that a device needs to perform > onboarding again after a movement? > > i.e. device A enrolls on network 1, gets an LDevID usable on network 1, > uses that with EAP-FOOBAR. > > device A then is moved to network 2, it tries to use same

[Emu] BRSKI-TEAP vs regular connection (was Re: EAP questions ...)

2019-11-07 Thread Michael Richardson
On 2019-11-07 12:43 p.m., Alan DeKok wrote: >> E.g. we have documented in >> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-lear-eap-teap-brski-05#section-5 that: >> >> " A device that has not been bootstrapped at all SHOULD send an >> identity of teap-bootstrap@TBD1. " >> >> If we register that