On Fri, 2019-03-01 at 12:00 -0500, Christopher Davis via engagement-
list wrote:
> After investingating Discourse esterday, I do have some objections
> that I think should be considered. Though the software itself is
> free,
> the mobile app is proprietrary
It's licensed under MIT:
I just open the page in the browser and on mobile it works completely fine.
There's no need for an app if that's an issue
On Mon, Mar 4, 2019 at 5:10 PM Christopher Davis via engagement-list <
engagement-list@gnome.org> wrote:
> After investingating Discourse esterday, I do have some objections
After investingating Discourse esterday, I do have some objections
that I think should be considered. Though the software itself is free,
the mobile app is proprietrary and the Android version has a hard
dependency
on the proprietary Google Chrome app. I don't think we should force
developers
I think we're trying not to diverge from upstream, otherwise we'll need
to maintain a branch. I've submitted a PR though to upstream for a
config there.
Neil
On Sat, 2019-03-02 at 08:22 +0100, Bastian Ilso wrote:
> Whoops! You're right.
>
> Maybe something worth clarifying in the login window?
Thanks Neil for setting up this (Discourse) instance up, see it as it could
be beneficial and helpful for the team.
On Sat, Mar 2, 2019 at 8:22 AM Bastian Ilso via engagement-list <
engagement-list@gnome.org> wrote:
> Whoops! You're right.
>
> Maybe something worth clarifying in the login
Whoops! You're right.
Maybe something worth clarifying in the login window?
Thanks for the help!
-Bastian
On fre, Mar 1, 2019 at 5:54 PM, Neil McGovern wrote:
Your username is bastianilso, not the full email address. Make sure
you
click on the ldap button :) It's the same username and
On Fri, Mar 1, 2019 at 5:50 PM Bastian Ilso via engagement-list
wrote:
>
> Great to see!
>
> I am having some trouble logging in with LDAP. It says
>
> "Sorry, there was an error authorizing your account. Perhaps you did not
> approve authorization?"
>
>
> I am trying to log in using the
Great to see!
I am having some trouble logging in with LDAP. It says
"Sorry, there was an error authorizing your account. Perhaps you did
not approve authorization?"
I am trying to log in using the "bastiani...@gnome.org" account.
-Bastian
On fre, Mar 1, 2019 at 5:29 PM, Neil McGovern
On Thu, 2019-02-07 at 08:57 -0500, s...@ramkrishna.me wrote:
> I brought this up in Telegram but didn't receive any objections.
>
Hi all,
News on the Discourse front - this is now live! Have a visit at
https://discourse.gnome.org
You can log in via LDAP, or sign up with email/google/github.
I am all in for using discourse and I am really looking forward to it! I
really like the interface.
On Wed, Feb 13, 2019 at 9:15 PM Neil McGovern wrote:
> On Wed, 2019-02-13 at 10:56 -0800, Britt Yazel wrote:
> > I agree, doing a mass invite would be better imo.
>
> Great, that's already
On Wed, 2019-02-13 at 10:56 -0800, Britt Yazel wrote:
> I agree, doing a mass invite would be better imo.
Great, that's already available:
https://meta.discourse.org/t/sending-bulk-user-invites/16468
> And it would be great to incorporate GNOME SSO with the different
> Discourse boards (is that
I agree, doing a mass invite would be better imo.
And it would be great to incorporate GNOME SSO with the different Discourse
boards (is that the correct term?). It will be one less password to have to
remember :-)
On Wed, Feb 13, 2019 at 10:28 AM Neil McGovern wrote:
> On Thu, 2019-02-07 at
On Thu, 2019-02-07 at 18:53 +0100, Alexandre Franke wrote:
> Awesome. Will subscriptions be moved automatically? Can we use our
> GNOME account to log in to the Discourse instance?
>
I can possibly work out how to migrate the subscriptions, though it may
be more polite to do a bulk invite rather
I’m excited to see the changes in the Management List :D
> On 8 Feb 2019, at 19:25, s...@ramkrishna.me wrote:
>
> On Fri, 2019-02-08 at 13:09 +, Ekaterina Gerasimova wrote:
>> On Thu, 7 Feb 2019 at 13:57, wrote:
>>> I brought this up in Telegram but didn't receive any objections.
>>>
>>>
Hola,
On Fri, 2019-02-08 at 15:28 +0100, Alexandre Franke wrote:
> My very own totally unscientific opinion is that hyperkitty is meh
> while Discourse is actually quite awesome (and I’ve always said I
> hated webforums prior to using Discourse).
:D Okay. I assume you are referring to the Web
On Thu, Feb 7, 2019 at 4:39 PM Tobias Mueller wrote:
> Hi,
Hey,
> On Thu, 2019-02-07 at 08:57 -0500, s...@ramkrishna.me wrote:
> I don't object, but I'd like to note that Mailman 3 meant to bring a Web
> interface if that's what you're after.
My very own totally unscientific opinion is that
On Thu, 7 Feb 2019 at 13:57, wrote:
>
> I brought this up in Telegram but didn't receive any objections.
>
> The GTK team are moving to discourse and I asked Neil if he could move
> us as well. Mailman is a sad anachronistic technology to be sent to
> the garbage bin. As well, maintenance is a
On Thu, Feb 7, 2019 at 2:57 PM wrote:
> If you have no objection, say nothing and I'll work on moving us out as
> soon as GTK gets finished. I'll move the rest of the engagement like
> lists that I manage as well.
Awesome. Will subscriptions be moved automatically? Can we use our
GNOME account
Hi,
On Thu, 2019-02-07 at 08:57 -0500, s...@ramkrishna.me wrote:
> If you have objections, please speak up. You can still interact by
> mail like you could previously so you won't see too much change. But
I don't object, but I'd like to note that Mailman 3 meant to bring a Web
interface if
wrote:
...
> I brought this up in Telegram but didn't receive any objections.
>
> The GTK team are moving to discourse and I asked Neil if he could move
> us as well.
...
> If you have no objection, say nothing and I'll work on moving us out as
> soon as GTK gets finished. I'll move the rest of
I brought this up in Telegram but didn't receive any objections.
The GTK team are moving to discourse and I asked Neil if he could move
us as well. Mailman is a sad anachronistic technology to be sent to
the garbage bin. As well, maintenance is a pain because of all the
spam. Moving to
21 matches
Mail list logo
