Re: GNOME Annual Report | Status Update - Layout Complete

[Jeff Fortin Tam]

Alright, all changes applied and pushed. You can see the history (for
the time being, that is) on 
https://github.com/gnome-design-team/gnome-marketing/commits/master
The main PDF file has been regenerated. When this is all OK'd, I guess
it'll have to be regenerated again with print colors & crop marks and
have a "-web" lightweight version. We need to sort out the
printers/distribution story now.
___
engagement-list mailing list
engagement-list@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/engagement-list

Re: GNOME Annual Report | Status Update - Layout Complete

[Allan Day]

Andreas Nilsson  wrote:
> Uh, hold on. Are these wording fixes that are coming now, when the design in
> in place. Wasn't the process that was set up supposed to deal with this on
> an earlier stage?
>
> For me, it's OK, since you'll do the adjustments yourself. I just want to
> stress that the process exist for a reason.

I was thoroughly distracted by the release notes when a lot of this
was happening, but perhaps we should have had a more definite
announcement of the period for final corrections?

Allan
___
engagement-list mailing list
engagement-list@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/engagement-list

Re: GNOME Annual Report | Status Update - Layout Complete

[Andreas Nilsson]

On 09/25/2015 05:19 AM, Jeff Fortin Tam wrote:

Le mardi 22 septembre 2015 à 19:13 +0100, Allan Day a écrit :


It would be nice to visually distinguish this report from last
year's, possibly by changing the colours used on the cover?

Out of curiosity, I looked into how the current Scribus file for the
report is done, and it looks like this would be a non-trivial amount of
work. To my surprise, the tessellated triangles that form the cover and
back pages' background are not some diagonal line trickery nor are they
a single solid object (ex: a SVG made with Inkscape): they actually are
true geometric objects made directly in Scribus and controlled
individually. Every triangle. All on the same layer (but grouped). Wow!
That must have taken quite a bit of time to create, otherwise I'm very
curious to hear what speedhack/technique was used.


It's this file: 
https://github.com/gnome-design-team/gnome-marketing/blob/master/annual-report-2014/cover.svg

Since it's vectors, Scribus can also edit it after import.




Granted, since those are solid colors and Scribus works with a set
palette, it might not be impossible to change them (but if you change
one, you ought to adjust most if not all of them). Perhaps a speedhack
would be to swap colors "in palette" instead of touching the objects.


It's green now. Not super-excellent, but more or less what I had time for.

- Andreas
___
engagement-list mailing list
engagement-list@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/engagement-list

Re: GNOME Annual Report | Status Update - Layout Complete

[Oliver Propst]

On Fri, Sep 25, 2015 at 8:35 PM, Nuritzi Sanchez

>
> Anyway, all of that is to say that I think we should build time into the
> annual report process to allow us to make a few tweaks after the layout is
> done.
>

Yeah that was where I wanted to come with my previous remark. Its great to
see someone formulate it out so clearly.


-- 
-mvh Oliver Propst
___
engagement-list mailing list
engagement-list@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/engagement-list

Re: GNOME Annual Report | Status Update - Layout Complete

[Nuritzi Sanchez]

I think we should add a step to the process where we can make minor tweaks
to the report's content after seeing the layout, like proofreading changes
and such.

At work, we usually leave a few rounds for making sure the content looks
good in the design. Part of the reason is that it's one thing to look at
the content in a word doc / wiki page, and another to see it within its
final resting place. Your eye catches things it may not have otherwise, or
you're able to see new areas for improvement once you see how it fits
within the larger context of the whole piece.

Anyway, all of that is to say that I think we should build time into the
annual report process to allow us to make a few tweaks after the layout is
done.

This year's report creation process had unique challenges for many reasons.
We should definitely talk about what went wrong and what went right during
our *annual report retrospective in mid-October* (to be scheduled after we
print copies and send them off!). I'm sure we can find ways to make the
process much smoother for next year, and keep learning each year how to
make it better and better. :)


On Fri, Sep 25, 2015 at 5:31 AM, Oliver Propst 
wrote:

> On Fri, Sep 25, 2015 at 12:16 PM, Jeff Fortin Tam 
> wrote:
>
>> So if y'all are fine with the fixes proposed in my previous mail, I'll
>> do them.
>>
>
> Please do.
>
> --
> -mvh Oliver Propst
>
> ___
> engagement-list mailing list
> engagement-list@gnome.org
> https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/engagement-list
>
>


-- 


.

*Nuritzi Sanchez*  |  +1.650.218.7388 |  Endless 
___
engagement-list mailing list
engagement-list@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/engagement-list

Re: GNOME Annual Report | Status Update - Layout Complete

[Andreas Nilsson]

Uh, hold on. Are these wording fixes that are coming now, when the 
design in in place. Wasn't the process that was set up supposed to deal 
with this on an earlier stage?
For me, it's OK, since you'll do the adjustments yourself. I just want 
to stress that the process exist for a reason.

- Andreas

On 09/25/2015 06:44 AM, Jeff Fortin Tam wrote:
Alright, here is my big list of nitpicks. If there are no objections I 
could fix them tomorrow or this week-end.
Also, I'd like to retroactively correct the previous year report's 
date to reduce confusion.



Page 1
- Correct my name for photo attribution
- Add/correct credits for coordinators, proofreading, design?

Page 3
- "whose names can be found on the next page" << "whose names can be 
seen at the beginning of this document"
- depending on available space: restore paragraph breaks, adjust 
paragraphs spacing [low priority]

- fix the bulleted list & indents/alignment [low priority]

4
- /"Here are some glimpses into what we have achieved in 2013-14."/ >> 
I suppose we do mean "2014-15" for hackfests?
- /"Builder, the IDE specific made for GNOME development,"/ >> Not 
sure about "specific"; "specifically"?


10
- /"Became clear to Board that"/ >> "Became clear to the Board that"
- Should "Pam" be replaced by "Pamela" (full length) everywhere?

11
- 2nd paragraph: /"to the situation at hand as they could in order 
to"/ >> add a comma after "could", or remove "at hand"?

- 3rd paragraph: "Family" is capitalized, is that intentional?

12
- 3rd paragraph: "Keynotes" is capitalized, is that normal?
- technically, it's "elementary OS" instead of "Elementary OS", but it 
would look weird in the middle of a sentence where all the other names 
are capitalized... thoughts?


13
- "All three keynotes were very given to packed rooms and rousing 
applause." >> "very given"..?

- 5th paragraph: "gstreamer" -> "GStreamer", "gpg" -> "GPG"

16
- 3rd paragraph, /"more reliab predictably",/ I suppose I should take 
out the "reliab"


17
- update the Collabora logo
- I believe SFLC was no longer listed on the foundation pages in 2014
- Year should be 2014, not 2013

18-20
- Add styling for the headings
- Fix the missing special character for "Micha" Bartoszkiewicz (again)

Hopefully that's all that's left? Besides figuring out if we can 
afford bespoke cover artwork this year :)



___
engagement-list mailing list
engagement-list@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/engagement-list


___
engagement-list mailing list
engagement-list@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/engagement-list

Re: GNOME Annual Report | Status Update - Layout Complete

[Oliver Propst]

On Fri, Sep 25, 2015 at 12:59 PM, Allan Day  wrote:
>
> I was thoroughly distracted by the release notes when a lot of this
> was happening,


Also had a busy period when some of this happened.


> but perhaps we should have had a more definite
> announcement of the period for final corrections?
>

While its great that we now have a more clear process for the creation of
the report, I also think its important to recognize that there must be room
for improvements and its good for us to reflect on the schedule.

Can state that I for example think its is a very short period of time to
only give the designer 3-4 days to correct the document.
-- 
-mvh Oliver Propst
___
engagement-list mailing list
engagement-list@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/engagement-list

Re: GNOME Annual Report | Status Update - Layout Complete

[Oliver Propst]

On Fri, Sep 25, 2015 at 12:16 PM, Jeff Fortin Tam 
wrote:

> So if y'all are fine with the fixes proposed in my previous mail, I'll
> do them.
>

Please do.

-- 
-mvh Oliver Propst
___
engagement-list mailing list
engagement-list@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/engagement-list

Re: GNOME Annual Report | Status Update - Layout Complete

[Jeff Fortin Tam]

Le vendredi 25 septembre 2015 à 10:42 +0200, Andreas Nilsson a écrit :
> Uh, hold on. Are these wording fixes that are coming now, when the
> design in in place. Wasn't the process that was set up supposed to
> deal with this on an earlier stage?
> For me, it's OK, since you'll do the adjustments yourself. I just
> want to stress that the process exist for a reason.

Yeah, I'm aware that textual changes shouldn't happen once sent to
layout; in theory this shouldn't happen (I shouldn't have found
uncaught errors :) but even multiple pairs of eyeballs can let mistakes
slip through, mistakes are human. I had to go sentence by sentence
through the whole thing to spot those (I didn't have the time to do
that in the past two weeks due to other deadlines). Overall it's typos
or typographic fixes. For my own article, it's cosmetic layout fixes.

The Groupon article seems to have changed a bit since I last looked at
it (I was helping with some versions of the draft but not a
proofreader) and I'm not sure if my suggestion on that article is
correct, so I'll check with the others.

So if y'all are fine with the fixes proposed in my previous mail, I'll
do them. Hopefully that would be the last of them.
___
engagement-list mailing list
engagement-list@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/engagement-list

Re: GNOME Annual Report | Status Update - Layout Complete

[Ekaterina Gerasimova]

On 23 September 2015 at 21:10, Oliver Propst  wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 23, 2015 at 5:55 PM, Nuritzi Sanchez
>  wrote:
>>
>> Ok, so sounds like we should change the title to "GNOME Annual Report
>> 2014-15". -
>
>
> Yeah actually sounds logical and as a good idea to me. Definitely support
> this suggestion.

I was under the impression that the report should correspond to the
financial years as it is partially targeted at the adboard, so
2013-2014 would make more sense to me.

(It would be awesome if we can get the 2014-2015 report out quicker!)

> --
> -mvh Oliver Propst
>
> ___
> engagement-list mailing list
> engagement-list@gnome.org
> https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/engagement-list
>
___
engagement-list mailing list
engagement-list@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/engagement-list

Re: GNOME Annual Report | Status Update - Layout Complete

[Andreas Nilsson]

On 09/22/2015 07:16 PM, Jeff Fortin Tam wrote:

Thank you for the awesome work, Andreas! :)


PS. Jeff: could you edit it and add your signature to the letter?
If you have any issues, mail the signature to me and I'll edit it.

Actually, I purposely did not include my signature as I believe this to
be a security risk: we have had occurrences of false checks being
emitted with Karen's signature in the past, and I think this could be
one way to somewhat reduce the risk of that sort of situation in the
future. For what it's worth, I looked at the Document Foundation's
annual report and it does not contain signatures either...


All right, makes sense.
I'll remove that.
- Andreas
___
engagement-list mailing list
engagement-list@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/engagement-list

Re: GNOME Annual Report | Status Update - Layout Complete

[Allan Day]

Ekaterina Gerasimova  wrote:
...
> I was under the impression that the report should correspond to the
> financial years as it is partially targeted at the adboard, so
> 2013-2014 would make more sense to me.

Ah yes, that's true. My mistake!

> (It would be awesome if we can get the 2014-2015 report out quicker!)

I assume that we're aiming to get the annual report out to advisory
board members in the period when they are planning their budgets for
the next financial year. Do we have an idea of when that is?

Allan
___
engagement-list mailing list
engagement-list@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/engagement-list

Re: GNOME Annual Report | Status Update - Layout Complete

[Sriram Ramkrishna]

On Thu, Sep 24, 2015, 6:01 AM Allan Day  wrote:

Ekaterina Gerasimova  wrote:
...
> I was under the impression that the report should correspond to the
> financial years as it is partially targeted at the adboard, so
> 2013-2014 would make more sense to me.

Ah yes, that's true. My mistake!

> (It would be awesome if we can get the 2014-2015 report out quicker!)

I assume that we're aiming to get the annual report out to advisory
board members in the period when they are planning their budgets for
the next financial year. Do we have an idea of when that is?

Allan
___
engagement-list mailing list
engagement-list@gnome.org
https ://
mail.gnome.org
/mailman/
listinfo
/
engagement-list


Usually july-october, and then do tweaks in November.

Sri
___
engagement-list mailing list
engagement-list@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/engagement-list

Re: GNOME Annual Report | Status Update - Layout Complete

[Allan Day]

Sriram Ramkrishna  wrote:
...
>> (It would be awesome if we can get the 2014-2015 report out quicker!)
>
> I assume that we're aiming to get the annual report out to advisory
> board members in the period when they are planning their budgets for
> the next financial year. Do we have an idea of when that is?
>
...
> Usually july-october, and then do tweaks in November.

OK, so aiming to be finished in time for GUADEC seems about right.
That's good to know - thanks Sri.

Allan
___
engagement-list mailing list
engagement-list@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/engagement-list

Re: GNOME Annual Report | Status Update - Layout Complete

[Karen Sandler]

On 2015-09-24 10:20, Allan Day wrote:

Sriram Ramkrishna  wrote:
...
(It would be awesome if we can get the 2014-2015 report out quicker!)

I assume that we're aiming to get the annual report out to advisory
board members in the period when they are planning their budgets for
the next financial year. Do we have an idea of when that is?

...
Usually july-october, and then do tweaks in November.

OK, so aiming to be finished in time for GUADEC seems about right.
That's good to know - thanks Sri.


+1 It really varies by company, depending on what their financial cycles 
are but generally getting things out by November is the way to go :)


karen


___
engagement-list mailing list
engagement-list@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/engagement-list

Re: GNOME Annual Report | Status Update - Layout Complete

[Karen Sandler]

On 2015-09-24 05:57, Andreas Nilsson wrote:

On 09/22/2015 07:16 PM, Jeff Fortin Tam wrote:
Thank you for the awesome work, Andreas! :)

PS. Jeff: could you edit it and add your signature to the letter?
If you have any issues, mail the signature to me and I'll edit it.
Actually, I purposely did not include my signature as I believe this to
be a security risk: we have had occurrences of false checks being
emitted with Karen's signature in the past, and I think this could be
one way to somewhat reduce the risk of that sort of situation in the
future. For what it's worth, I looked at the Document Foundation's
annual report and it does not contain signatures either...

All right, makes sense.
I'll remove that.


FWIW (and zana can confirm), I think the signatures on the checks were 
not my actual signature but I don't disagree with this conclusion :)


karen
___
engagement-list mailing list
engagement-list@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/engagement-list

Re: GNOME Annual Report | Status Update - Layout Complete

[Jeff Fortin Tam]

Le mardi 22 septembre 2015 à 19:13 +0100, Allan Day a écrit :

> It would be nice to visually distinguish this report from last
> year's, possibly by changing the colours used on the cover?

Out of curiosity, I looked into how the current Scribus file for the
report is done, and it looks like this would be a non-trivial amount of
work. To my surprise, the tessellated triangles that form the cover and
back pages' background are not some diagonal line trickery nor are they
a single solid object (ex: a SVG made with Inkscape): they actually are
true geometric objects made directly in Scribus and controlled
individually. Every triangle. All on the same layer (but grouped). Wow!
That must have taken quite a bit of time to create, otherwise I'm very
curious to hear what speedhack/technique was used.

Granted, since those are solid colors and Scribus works with a set
palette, it might not be impossible to change them (but if you change
one, you ought to adjust most if not all of them). Perhaps a speedhack
would be to swap colors "in palette" instead of touching the objects.

Dunno how feasible it is at this stage, I'll let Andreas comment :)
In the meantime I will review the rest of the document and propose
patches for fixes I can easily make.
___
engagement-list mailing list
engagement-list@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/engagement-list

Re: GNOME Annual Report | Status Update - Layout Complete

[Rosanna Yuen]

On Thu, Sep 24, 2015 at 8:57 AM, Karen Sandler  wrote:

> On 2015-09-24 05:57, Andreas Nilsson wrote:
>
>> On 09/22/2015 07:16 PM, Jeff Fortin Tam wrote:
>> Thank you for the awesome work, Andreas! :)
>>
>> PS. Jeff: could you edit it and add your signature to the letter?
>> If you have any issues, mail the signature to me and I'll edit it.
>> Actually, I purposely did not include my signature as I believe this to
>> be a security risk: we have had occurrences of false checks being
>> emitted with Karen's signature in the past, and I think this could be
>> one way to somewhat reduce the risk of that sort of situation in the
>> future. For what it's worth, I looked at the Document Foundation's
>> annual report and it does not contain signatures either...
>>
>> All right, makes sense.
>> I'll remove that.
>>
>
> FWIW (and zana can confirm), I think the signatures on the checks were not
> my actual signature but I don't disagree with this conclusion :)


Confirmed.

-Rosanna


>
>
> karen
>
> ___
> engagement-list mailing list
> engagement-list@gnome.org
> https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/engagement-list
>



-- 
Rosanna Yuen
Director of Operations
GNOME Foundation, Inc.
___
engagement-list mailing list
engagement-list@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/engagement-list

Re: GNOME Annual Report | Status Update - Layout Complete

[Jeff Fortin Tam]

Alright, here is my big list of nitpicks. If there are no objections I
could fix them tomorrow or this week-end.
Also, I'd like to retroactively correct the previous year report's date
to reduce confusion.


Page 1
- Correct my name for photo attribution
- Add/correct credits for coordinators, proofreading, design?

Page 3
- "whose names can be found on the next page" << "whose names can be
seen at the beginning of this document"
- depending on available space: restore paragraph breaks, adjust
paragraphs spacing [low priority]
- fix the bulleted list & indents/alignment [low priority]

4
- "Here are some glimpses into what we have achieved in 2013-14." >> I
suppose we do mean "2014-15" for hackfests?
- "Builder, the IDE specific made for GNOME development," >> Not sure
about "specific"; "specifically"?

10
- "Became clear to Board that" >> "Became clear to the Board that"
- Should "Pam" be replaced by "Pamela" (full length) everywhere?

11
- 2nd paragraph: "to the situation at hand as they could in order to"
>> add a comma after "could", or remove "at hand"?
- 3rd paragraph: "Family" is capitalized, is that intentional?

12
- 3rd paragraph: "Keynotes" is capitalized, is that normal?
- technically, it's "elementary OS" instead of "Elementary OS", but it
would look weird in the middle of a sentence where all the other names
are capitalized... thoughts?

13
- "All three keynotes were very given to packed rooms and rousing
applause." >> "very given"..?
- 5th paragraph: "gstreamer" -> "GStreamer", "gpg" -> "GPG"

16
- 3rd paragraph, "more reliab predictably", I suppose I should take out
the "reliab"

17
- update the Collabora logo
- I believe SFLC was no longer listed on the foundation pages in 2014
- Year should be 2014, not 2013

18-20
- Add styling for the headings
- Fix the missing special character for "Micha" Bartoszkiewicz (again)

Hopefully that's all that's left? Besides figuring out if we can afford
bespoke cover artwork this year :)___
engagement-list mailing list
engagement-list@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/engagement-list

Re: GNOME Annual Report | Status Update - Layout Complete

[Nuritzi Sanchez]

Ok, so sounds like we should change the title to "*GNOME Annual Report
2014-15*".

*@Andreas*, can you please help us do that? Let us know if you have time to
change the cover artwork. Otherwise, we may want to move on and just make a
note to change the theme next year.


On Wed, Sep 23, 2015 at 1:28 AM, Juanjo Marín 
wrote:

>
>
>
>
>
> El Martes 22 de septiembre de 2015 20:13, Allan Day 
> escribió:
> >Thanks for working on this, Andreas! It looks great.
>
> >
>
> Yes, I agree. I'm very impressed for the visual aspect of the annual
> report.
> >
> >I'm pretty busy with the release, so I've only had a quick look. Two
> >thoughts though:
> >
> >
> >1. It would be nice to visually distinguish this report from last
> >year's, possibly by changing the colours used on the cover?
> >
> >
> >2. As I mentioned previously, I'm kinda confused about the dates
> >covered by the annual reports, both as a reader and a contributor.
> >This one is called the "GNOME Annual Report 2014", which makes it
> >sound like it covers the 2014 calendar year. Confusingly, last year's
> >report had *exactly* the same title. If the reports are for the
> >financial year, perhaps it would be clearer to title it "GNOME Annual
> >Report 2014-15"? We could also clarify the exact time period covered
> >somewhere else, too (such as in the introductory letter, or in the
> >table of contents).
>
> >
>
> Yes, the report usually is about the activity beetween GUADEC and GUADEC.
> It means meanly the activities related to releases 3.14 and 3.16 in this
> case. So I think that Allan suggestion is the best way to convey this idea
> with "GNOME Annual Report 2014-15" in the title
>
> Cheers,
>
>-- Juanjo Marin
> ___
> engagement-list mailing list
> engagement-list@gnome.org
> https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/engagement-list
>



-- 


.

*Nuritzi Sanchez*  |  +1.650.218.7388 |  Endless 
___
engagement-list mailing list
engagement-list@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/engagement-list

Re: GNOME Annual Report | Status Update - Layout Complete

[Juanjo Marín]

El Martes 22 de septiembre de 2015 20:13, Allan Day  
escribió:
>Thanks for working on this, Andreas! It looks great.

>

Yes, I agree. I'm very impressed for the visual aspect of the annual report.
>
>I'm pretty busy with the release, so I've only had a quick look. Two
>thoughts though:
>
>
>1. It would be nice to visually distinguish this report from last
>year's, possibly by changing the colours used on the cover?
>
>
>2. As I mentioned previously, I'm kinda confused about the dates
>covered by the annual reports, both as a reader and a contributor.
>This one is called the "GNOME Annual Report 2014", which makes it
>sound like it covers the 2014 calendar year. Confusingly, last year's
>report had *exactly* the same title. If the reports are for the
>financial year, perhaps it would be clearer to title it "GNOME Annual
>Report 2014-15"? We could also clarify the exact time period covered
>somewhere else, too (such as in the introductory letter, or in the
>table of contents).

>

Yes, the report usually is about the activity beetween GUADEC and GUADEC. It 
means meanly the activities related to releases 3.14 and 3.16 in this case. So 
I think that Allan suggestion is the best way to convey this idea with "GNOME 
Annual Report 2014-15" in the title

Cheers,

   -- Juanjo Marin
___
engagement-list mailing list
engagement-list@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/engagement-list

Re: GNOME Annual Report | Status Update - Layout Complete

[Jeff Fortin Tam]

Thank you for the awesome work, Andreas! :)

> PS. Jeff: could you edit it and add your signature to the letter?
> If you have any issues, mail the signature to me and I'll edit it.

Actually, I purposely did not include my signature as I believe this to
be a security risk: we have had occurrences of false checks being
emitted with Karen's signature in the past, and I think this could be
one way to somewhat reduce the risk of that sort of situation in the
future. For what it's worth, I looked at the Document Foundation's
annual report and it does not contain signatures either...
___
engagement-list mailing list
engagement-list@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/engagement-list

Re: GNOME Annual Report | Status Update - Layout Complete

[Oliver Propst]

Thanks so much for doing the layout Andreas, looks great.

Think we should aim to have a publish ready version of the report early
next week (which includes minor fixes).

Have started working on a announcement post (available in our WordPress
instance as a draft) which I plan to finish during the weekend.

Thanks everyone who have contributed to the report so far, now let's do the
minor fixes and get the report published!

-- 
-mvh Oliver Propst
___
engagement-list mailing list
engagement-list@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/engagement-list

Re: GNOME Annual Report | Status Update - Layout Complete

[Andreas Nilsson]

On 09/21/2015 09:53 PM, Bastian Ilso wrote:

Hi Andreas,

Looks awesome! I see a "$PAGE" in the letter from gnome foundation 
letter? :)


Fixed.
- Andreas
___
engagement-list mailing list
engagement-list@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/engagement-list

Re: GNOME Annual Report | Status Update - Layout Complete

[Andreas Nilsson]

On 09/22/2015 01:12 AM, Alexandre Franke wrote:

I guess that means it's too late for content changes, but just in case
it's not, I'd add the locations for the events in "Other conferences"
on page 13:
"staffed a booth at Fosdem (Brussels, Belgium), JDLL (Lyon, France),
and FSCONS (Gothenburg, Sweden). We also sent
representatives to SXSW (Austin, Texas), DebConf14 (Portland, Oregan,
and FOSSASIA (Phnom Penh, Cambodia)."


Sorry, that won't fit. I took the text as handed to me and it would take 
time I don't have to replan the layout to make the locations fit.




Also I don't see why FOSDEM isn't spelled in caps here.



Fixed.
- Andreas
___
engagement-list mailing list
engagement-list@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/engagement-list

Re: GNOME Annual Report | Status Update - Layout Complete

[Alexandre Franke]

On Mon, Sep 21, 2015 at 9:11 PM, Andreas Nilsson  wrote:
> Hi!

Hej,

> Here is the final version of the layout for the annual report.
> Please double check everything is correct with regards to page numbers,
> paragraphs, margins, credits etc.

I guess that means it's too late for content changes, but just in case
it's not, I'd add the locations for the events in "Other conferences"
on page 13:
"staffed a booth at Fosdem (Brussels, Belgium), JDLL (Lyon, France),
and FSCONS (Gothenburg, Sweden). We also sent
representatives to SXSW (Austin, Texas), DebConf14 (Portland, Oregan,
and FOSSASIA (Phnom Penh, Cambodia)."

Also I don't see why FOSDEM isn't spelled in caps here.

-- 
Alexandre Franke
___
engagement-list mailing list
engagement-list@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/engagement-list

Re: GNOME Annual Report | Status Update - Layout Complete

[Bastian Ilso]

Hi Andreas,

Looks awesome! I see a "$PAGE" in the letter from gnome foundation 
letter? :)



-Bastian

On Mon, Sep 21, 2015 at 9:11 , Andreas Nilsson  
wrote:

Hi!
Here is the final version of the layout for the annual report.
Please double check everything is correct with regards to page 
numbers, paragraphs, margins, credits etc.


Source scribus file: 
https://raw.githubusercontent.com/gnome-design-team/gnome-marketing/master/annual-report-2015/GAR2014.sla
PDF: 
https://github.com/gnome-design-team/gnome-marketing/blob/master/annual-report-2015/GAR2014.pdf


PS. Jeff: could you edit it and add your signature to the letter?
If you have any issues, mail the signature to me and I'll edit it.

Sorry for the general delay, and thanks for having the material in 
such a great state. It helped a lot!

- Andreas
___
engagement-list mailing list
engagement-list@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/engagement-list
___
engagement-list mailing list
engagement-list@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/engagement-list

Re: GNOME Annual Report | Status Update - Layout Complete

[Bastian Ilso]

Another quick one:


on page 18 it says 'Accessability' in the header instead of 
'Accessibility'.



-Bastian

On Mon, Sep 21, 2015 at 9:53 , Bastian Ilso  
wrote:

Hi Andreas,

Looks awesome! I see a "$PAGE" in the letter from gnome foundation 
letter? :)



-Bastian

On Mon, Sep 21, 2015 at 9:11 , Andreas Nilsson  
wrote:

Hi!
Here is the final version of the layout for the annual report.
Please double check everything is correct with regards to page 
numbers, paragraphs, margins, credits etc.


Source scribus file: 
https://raw.githubusercontent.com/gnome-design-team/gnome-marketing/master/annual-report-2015/GAR2014.sla
PDF: 
https://github.com/gnome-design-team/gnome-marketing/blob/master/annual-report-2015/GAR2014.pdf


PS. Jeff: could you edit it and add your signature to the letter?
If you have any issues, mail the signature to me and I'll edit it.

Sorry for the general delay, and thanks for having the material in 
such a great state. It helped a lot!

- Andreas
___
engagement-list mailing list
engagement-list@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/engagement-list
___
engagement-list mailing list
engagement-list@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/engagement-list

GNOME Annual Report | Status Update - Layout Complete

[Andreas Nilsson]

Hi!
Here is the final version of the layout for the annual report.
Please double check everything is correct with regards to page numbers, 
paragraphs, margins, credits etc.


Source scribus file: 
https://raw.githubusercontent.com/gnome-design-team/gnome-marketing/master/annual-report-2015/GAR2014.sla
PDF: 
https://github.com/gnome-design-team/gnome-marketing/blob/master/annual-report-2015/GAR2014.pdf


PS. Jeff: could you edit it and add your signature to the letter?
If you have any issues, mail the signature to me and I'll edit it.

Sorry for the general delay, and thanks for having the material in such 
a great state. It helped a lot!

- Andreas
___
engagement-list mailing list
engagement-list@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/engagement-list