- Original Message -
From: Livnat Peer lp...@redhat.com
To: Simon Grinberg si...@redhat.com
Cc: engine-devel engine-devel@ovirt.org
Sent: Thursday, July 5, 2012 8:58:20 AM
Subject: Re: [Engine-devel] Fwd: Problem in REST API handling/displaying of
logical networks
On 04/07/12 19:49,
On Jul 4, 2012, at 12:11 , Dan Kenigsberg wrote:
On Wed, Jul 04, 2012 at 03:16:17AM -0400, Ofer Schreiber wrote:
- Original Message -
On Tue, Jul 03, 2012 at 06:20:43PM +0300, Michal Skrivanek wrote:
On Jul 3, 2012, at 16:53 , Juan Hernandez wrote:
On 07/03/2012 03:43 PM, Ofer
- Original Message -
- Original Message -
From: Itamar Heim ih...@redhat.com
To: Simon Grinberg si...@redhat.com
Cc: engine-devel engine-devel@ovirt.org
Sent: Wednesday, July 4, 2012 7:38:46 PM
Subject: Re: [Engine-devel] Fwd: Problem in REST API
On 07/05/2012 10:51 AM, Livnat Peer wrote:
Actually the API has the same concept as you suggest for storage
domains.
At the top level you don't have a status field, but under data
center level, where it's valid then you get the status property.
Same should go for networks.
The status
On 07/05/2012 11:40 AM, Livnat Peer wrote:
On 05/07/12 11:31, Michael Pasternak wrote:
On 07/05/2012 10:51 AM, Livnat Peer wrote:
Actually the API has the same concept as you suggest for storage
domains.
At the top level you don't have a status field, but under data
center level, where it's
- Original Message -
From: Michael Pasternak mpast...@redhat.com
To: Livnat Peer lp...@redhat.com
Cc: engine-devel engine-devel@ovirt.org, Simon Grinberg
si...@redhat.com
Sent: Thursday, July 5, 2012 11:31:41 AM
Subject: Re: [Engine-devel] Fwd: Problem in REST API
On 05/07/12 11:56, Michael Pasternak wrote:
On 07/05/2012 11:40 AM, Livnat Peer wrote:
On 05/07/12 11:31, Michael Pasternak wrote:
On 07/05/2012 10:51 AM, Livnat Peer wrote:
Actually the API has the same concept as you suggest for storage
domains.
At the top level you don't have a status
On 07/05/2012 12:00 PM, Simon Grinberg wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Michael Pasternak mpast...@redhat.com
To: Livnat Peer lp...@redhat.com
Cc: engine-devel engine-devel@ovirt.org, Simon Grinberg
si...@redhat.com
Sent: Thursday, July 5, 2012 11:31:41 AM
Subject: Re:
- Original Message -
- Original Message -
From: Ayal Baron aba...@redhat.com
Sent: Wednesday, July 4, 2012 9:29:55 AM
- Original Message -
On 07/03/2012 06:44 PM, Miki Kenneth wrote:
- Original Message -
Hey,
On 07/05/2012 12:19 PM, Livnat Peer wrote:
I'll give you one scenario and I'm sure there are lot more:
delete all unused networks
not strong enough use case in my opinion
i do see sense in this, and based on my experience of
closing ~5 bugs on this for SD and explaining like
On 07/05/2012 01:38 PM, Livnat Peer wrote:
On 05/07/12 13:23, Mike Kolesnik wrote:
On 07/05/2012 12:19 PM, Livnat Peer wrote:
I'll give you one scenario and I'm sure there are lot more:
delete all unused networks
not strong enough use case in my opinion
i do see sense in this, and
On 07/05/2012 01:43 PM, Mike Kolesnik wrote:
- Original Message -
On 05/07/12 13:23, Mike Kolesnik wrote:
On 07/05/2012 12:19 PM, Livnat Peer wrote:
I'll give you one scenario and I'm sure there are lot more:
delete all unused networks
not strong enough use case in my opinion
12 matches
Mail list logo
