- Original Message -
> From: "Itamar Heim"
> To: "Juan Hernandez"
> Cc: "Allon Mureinik" , engine-devel@ovirt.org
> Sent: Monday, July 23, 2012 2:44:02 PM
> Subject: Re: [Engine-devel] java 1.6 compatibility no more?
>
> On 07/23/2012 02:31 PM, Juan Hernandez wrote:
> > Well, for me pe
- Original Message -
> From: "Juan Hernandez"
> To: "Allon Mureinik"
> Cc: engine-devel@ovirt.org
> Sent: Monday, July 23, 2012 2:31:24 PM
> Subject: Re: [Engine-devel] java 1.6 compatibility no more?
>
> On 07/23/2012 01:02 PM, Allon Mureinik wrote:
> >
> >
> > - Original Messag
Hi guys,
On the release notes draft [1] one of the items is "New Python CLI, packaged as
??? (CLI).". The CLI page on the wiki says the package is ovirt-engine-cli, but
this package doesn't exist in the beta repo. Is the CLI actually being
delivered?
Thanks,
Steve
[1] http://wiki.ovirt.org/w
It appears to me that the cross-origin issue is caused because the plugin
definition is embedded in the WebAdmin host page that is hosted by the JBoss
AS. This then requires that all plugins also exist within the same origin.
Rather than extending the WebAdmin page with javascript, would it be
On 07/23/2012 03:26 PM, Vojtech Szocs wrote:
I agree with your points. Deploying custom plugins on Engine JBoss, just for
the purpose of sharing same origin, sounds a bit strange, and complicates
things from package perspective.
As for cross-origin iframe communication issues, there are severa
I agree with your points. Deploying custom plugins on Engine JBoss, just for
the purpose of sharing same origin, sounds a bit strange, and complicates
things from package perspective.
As for cross-origin iframe communication issues, there are several ways how to
address them:
- use CORS (Cross-
On 07/23/2012 02:31 PM, Juan Hernandez wrote:
Well, for me personally the price is actually zero, as I don't use the
Eclipse maven support ;-) . But I know that many people hates when they
try to import the projects and they get errors because of plugins that
Eclipse doesn't understand. Let's see
On 07/23/2012 01:02 PM, Allon Mureinik wrote:
>
>
> - Original Message -
>> From: "Juan Hernandez"
>> To: "Allon Mureinik"
>> Cc: "Itamar Heim" , engine-devel@ovirt.org
>> Sent: Monday, July 23, 2012 1:22:37 PM
>> Subject: Re: [Engine-devel] java 1.6 compatibility no more?
>>
>> On 07/2
On 07/23/2012 02:02 PM, Allon Mureinik wrote:
- Original Message -
From: "Juan Hernandez"
To: "Allon Mureinik"
Cc: "Itamar Heim", engine-devel@ovirt.org
Sent: Monday, July 23, 2012 1:22:37 PM
Subject: Re: [Engine-devel] java 1.6 compatibility no more?
On 07/23/2012 11:46 AM, Allon Mur
- Original Message -
> From: "Juan Hernandez"
> To: "Allon Mureinik"
> Cc: "Itamar Heim" , engine-devel@ovirt.org
> Sent: Monday, July 23, 2012 1:22:37 PM
> Subject: Re: [Engine-devel] java 1.6 compatibility no more?
>
> On 07/23/2012 11:46 AM, Allon Mureinik wrote:
> >
> >
> > -
On 07/23/2012 01:22 PM, Juan Hernandez wrote:
On 07/23/2012 11:46 AM, Allon Mureinik wrote:
- Original Message -
From: "Itamar Heim"
To: "Allon Mureinik"
Cc: "Livnat Peer" , "Juan Hernandez" ,
engine-devel@ovirt.org, "Michael
Kublin"
Sent: Monday, July 23, 2012 8:43:02 AM
Subject:
On 07/23/2012 11:46 AM, Allon Mureinik wrote:
>
>
> - Original Message -
>> From: "Itamar Heim"
>> To: "Allon Mureinik"
>> Cc: "Livnat Peer" , "Juan Hernandez"
>> , engine-devel@ovirt.org, "Michael
>> Kublin"
>> Sent: Monday, July 23, 2012 8:43:02 AM
>> Subject: Re: [Engine-devel] jav
On 07/23/2012 01:10 PM, Vojtech Szocs wrote:
it is not supposed to be next to engine.jar, it is supposed to be
somewhere else entirely, served to clients like any static content via a
servelt.
If the GWT UI plugin web application won't be deployed on Engine JBoss AS
instance, we'll run into cr
> it is not supposed to be next to engine.jar, it is supposed to be
> somewhere else entirely, served to clients like any static content via a
> servelt.
If the GWT UI plugin web application won't be deployed on Engine JBoss AS
instance, we'll run into cross-origin iframe communication issues t
On 07/23/2012 12:40 PM, Vojtech Szocs wrote:
this implies server side code running on the engine,
Actually, yes and no :) let me explain:
- UI plugins developed in GWT need some context (plugin web application
deployed next to engine.ear) from which their code will be served
it is not suppo
- Original Message -
> From: "Itamar Heim"
> To: "Allon Mureinik"
> Cc: "Livnat Peer" , "Juan Hernandez" ,
> engine-devel@ovirt.org, "Michael
> Kublin"
> Sent: Monday, July 23, 2012 8:43:02 AM
> Subject: Re: [Engine-devel] java 1.6 compatibility no more?
>
> On 07/23/2012 08:29 AM, A
> this implies server side code running on the engine,
Actually, yes and no :) let me explain:
- UI plugins developed in GWT need some context (plugin web application
deployed next to engine.ear) from which their code will be served
- UI plugin web applications can contain only static resources
Hi guys,
This morning a couple of patches were merged to remove Gluster's dependency on
PowerMock (Shireesh and Selvasundaram - thanks for your commitment and
involvement!).
Consequentially, there is no more need to fork bll's tests, so that too was
removed.
Currently, bll's full build runs in
On 07/20/2012 11:37 PM, Vojtech Szocs wrote:
Last but not least, writing plugins in Google Web Toolkit (GWT) should
be as easy as providing your own plugin source page. Just deploy your
GWT plugin application on JBoss AS (next to engine.ear), and point to
GWT plugin application host page.
this
19 matches
Mail list logo
