On 07/02/12 17:43, Ayal Baron wrote:
- Original Message -
- Original Message -
On 02/05/2012 02:57 PM, Miki Kenneth wrote:
...
Isn't the VM version derived from the version of the cluster
on
which it was last edited?
For example: you've created a VM on a cluster
On 03/02/12 17:00, Itamar Heim wrote:
On 02/02/2012 12:15 PM, Ayal Baron wrote:
- Original Message -
On 02/02/2012 08:46 AM, Itamar Heim wrote:
On 02/02/2012 02:56 AM, Eli Mesika wrote:
Hi
We had discussed today the Stable Device Addresses feature
One of the questions arose from
On 05/02/12 10:45, Livnat Peer wrote:
On 05/02/12 10:34, Yaniv Kaul wrote:
- Original Message -
On 03/02/12 17:00, Itamar Heim wrote:
On 02/02/2012 12:15 PM, Ayal Baron wrote:
- Original Message -
On 02/02/2012 08:46 AM, Itamar Heim wrote:
On 02/02/2012 02:56 AM, Eli
- Original Message -
From: Livnat Peer lp...@redhat.com
To: Yaniv Kaul yk...@redhat.com
Cc: dl...@redhat.com, engine-devel@ovirt.org
Sent: Sunday, February 5, 2012 10:46:56 AM
Subject: Re: [Engine-devel] oVirt upstream meeting : VM Version
On 05/02/12 10:45, Livnat Peer wrote
On 02/05/2012 02:57 PM, Miki Kenneth wrote:
...
Isn't the VM version derived from the version of the cluster on
which it was last edited?
For example: you've created a VM on a cluster v3.0. When it is
running on a v3.2 cluster, is there any reason to change its
version?
When it is edited, then
- Original Message -
On 02/05/2012 02:57 PM, Miki Kenneth wrote:
...
Isn't the VM version derived from the version of the cluster on
which it was last edited?
For example: you've created a VM on a cluster v3.0. When it is
running on a v3.2 cluster, is there any reason to
On 02/02/2012 08:46 AM, Itamar Heim wrote:
On 02/02/2012 02:56 AM, Eli Mesika wrote:
Hi
We had discussed today the Stable Device Addresses feature
One of the questions arose from the meeting (and actually defined as
an open issue in the feature wiki) is:
What happens to a 3.1 VM running on 3.1
- Original Message -
On 02/02/2012 08:46 AM, Itamar Heim wrote:
On 02/02/2012 02:56 AM, Eli Mesika wrote:
Hi
We had discussed today the Stable Device Addresses feature
One of the questions arose from the meeting (and actually defined
as
an open issue in the feature wiki)
On 02/02/2012 02:56 AM, Eli Mesika wrote:
Hi
We had discussed today the Stable Device Addresses feature
One of the questions arose from the meeting (and actually defined as an open
issue in the feature wiki) is:
What happens to a 3.1 VM running on 3.1 Cluster when it is moved to a 3.0
