I noticed since version 1.8.1 I have to activate automatic decryption to
save or open attachments. Otherwise TB would complain the attachment was
empty or non-existent. I keep my e-mails in an IMAP account.
Is this a bug?
___
enigmail-users mailing list
Your right Olav, now using PGP/Mime the body can be read now in the gmail web
browser. I wonder when Gmail changed. I can recall my friends complaints that
there was nothing in the message. I wonder how it looks in Outlook now.
In Line can look 'ugly' , but I have got use to it now. I will gibe
Your right Olav, bow using PGP/Mime the body can be read now. I wonder when
Gmail changed. I can recall my friends complaing there was nothing in the
message. I wonder how it looks in Outlook now.
In Line can look 'ugly' , but I have got use to it now. I will gibe PGP/Mime a
try again.
On 31/0
> is PGP/MIME compatible with S/MIME ?
No. S/MIME is a protocol for email cryptography, roughly comparable to
OpenPGP + PGP/MIME. However, just because they do similar things
doesn't mean they're compatible, in the same way that a Blu-Ray player
can't play HD-DVD discs.
smime.p7s
Description
On 03/30/2015 11:38 AM, Olav Seyfarth wrote:
> Hi Ian,{ snip }
>
> Sure. That's the beauty of INLINE. It ALWAYS works (with plain text).
> But looks
> ugly ;-)
>
> > It is nice we have the choice to select from.
>
> Sure. And this will stay in Enigmail. You may set your personal
> preference,
> l
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Hi Ian,
> I started off using PGP/MIME, it seemed neat. However, some contacts read
> their mail in web browsers, eg Gmail, and all they saw was the signature
> and could not view content of the message.
It is true that web mail clients often do n
