On Tue 2018-10-09 09:22:13 +0200, Werner Koch wrote:
> On Fri, 5 Oct 2018 17:34, d...@fifthhorseman.net said:
>
>> I ran into this with some older versions of GnuPG (e.g. the
>> heavily-patched GnuPG 2.1.18 in debian stretch) during the enigmail test
>
> Do you happen to know whether this is also
On Fri, 5 Oct 2018 17:34, d...@fifthhorseman.net said:
> I ran into this with some older versions of GnuPG (e.g. the
> heavily-patched GnuPG 2.1.18 in debian stretch) during the enigmail test
Do you happen to know whether this is also the case with current
upstream or with gpg-agent not being ru