On Sun 2018-05-27 14:12:25 -0400, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
>> Run the unit tests in package. I think that almost everything covered by
>> tests, except for the ASM.
>
> thanks, i'll make sure to run both "check" and "unit". I note that i
> can't run the "eslint" part of the test suite on the
On 28.05.18 18:32, Werner Koch wrote:
> On Sun, 27 May 2018 20:12, d...@fifthhorseman.net said:
>
>>> 1. creating the Autocrypt header: the key is specified to contain
>>> exactly one UID one public/signing key and one encryption key. There is
>>> no function in GnuPG to extract this from a key.
On Sun, 27 May 2018 20:12, d...@fifthhorseman.net said:
>> 1. creating the Autocrypt header: the key is specified to contain
>> exactly one UID one public/signing key and one encryption key. There is
>> no function in GnuPG to extract this from a key. Users that have many
>> UIDs or many subkeys
On Sat 2018-05-26 18:31:46 +0200, Patrick Brunschwig wrote:
> Let's be fair ;). OpenPGP.js is LGPL, which is considered open source.
> The fact that Debian cannot handle the way that OpenPGP.js is built does
> not make it (or Enigmail) less open source, but is primarily a
> Debian-issue.
Yes, i
On 25.05.18 19:44, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
> Hi Patrick--
>
> thanks for your response on this!
>
> On Fri 2018-05-25 08:51:21 +0200, Patrick Brunschwig wrote:
>> I cannot see a way out of this. Moreover, it's likely that OpenPGP.js
>> will be used more in the future, because the native
hi patrick and other enigmail folks--
modern enigmail (2.0+) includes a copy of openpgp.js. It does not
appear to be built from source, but is instead a straight copy of a
generated block of javascript from the OpenPGP.js git repo (the
node/javascript community appears to have a common pattern
