On 12/02/15 13:59, Matthew Woehlke wrote:
> E-mail lists (or NNTP, darn it! ❤gmane❤) are less obnoxious than
> every software program using their own individual web-based forums
> (never mind that web-based forums - and web-based e-mail, for that
> matter - are just generally more annoying), and
On Thursday, December 03, 2015 10:43:54 AM Mike Acker wrote:
> I was horrified to learn that T-Bird would switch to OpenPGP
> in order to comply with Mozilla's demand that all code be in JavaScript
This is not happening and I would encourage you to not post unverified
information that is
> Even in corporate settings?
Especially in corporate settings. Most employees don't like email and
try to avoid it. Most of what enters an employee's corporate inbox is
spam generated by that same corporation: company-wide emails that really
should've been sent to a small group, invitations to
Linux Mozilla
:-[ my bad
this is nonetheless an interesting development. on the one hand
I'd hate to see Thunderbird lapse and become inconsequential .
OTH this could be an opportunity for T-Bird to break away from
Mozilla policy -- which might not be
I have to agree with your
remarks although I'd like to add that, in my view, eMail use will
approach a horizontal asymptote: ending as a sort of "good old
standby". "FWIW" I think more and more people are recognizing
the issues with "social media" and this
On 02.12.2015 at 19:38 Robert J. Hansen wrote:
>> this is nonetheless an interesting development. on the one hand I'd
>> hate to see Thunderbird lapse and become inconsequential .
>
> To a large extent it already has. Email usage has been declining for
> many years. The largest
> E-mail remains the primary form of written communication in business,
This depends a lot on your business. I know a fair number of
businesspeople who rely on SMS far more than they do email. Skype for
Business, Lync, and Google Hangouts are also transforming how business
communicates.
On 12/02/15 14:51, Stephen wrote:
> If anything, it is the market for stand-alone mail clients that is
> diminishing. Webmail is accessible from any computer with a reasonably
> modern web-browser. This is probably how a large majority now use
> e-mail. Most people cannot be bothered with the
On 12/2/15 3:50 PM, Phil Stracchino wrote:
> On 12/02/15 14:51, Stephen wrote:
>> If anything, it is the market for stand-alone mail clients that is
>> diminishing. Webmail is accessible from any computer with a reasonably
>> modern web-browser. This is probably how a large majority now use
>>
On 12/2/2015 11:48 AM, Mike Acker wrote:
> i terms of e/mail though -- and I suspect most folks would agree -- the
> trend seems to be to web-base clients -- although these seem to be
> sluggish and messy .
Some of our firm's clients are sensitive security entities, and as a
result we are not
Definitely. ProtonMail is pretty legit. It is open source (at least the
client) and seems to do full end to end encryption. The only problem with
ProtonMail is that you don't have control over the private key that's
generated. Also you have to trust (check the client throughly) to make sure
your
the news I'm reading LWN
suggests that Thunderbird's separation from Linux -- is is done
deal
hopefully Thunderbird will just become its own project
thoughts,-anyone?
--
/Mike
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
12 matches
Mail list logo
