Re: [Enigmail] Request for Translation

2014-07-06 Thread Nicolai Josuttis (enigmail)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Hello, thanks for this feedback. As a programmer I fully agree. We (programmers and translators) have the same goal here, because the current mess is a problem for programming and maintenance of the code. We didn't though have enough time to

Re: [Enigmail] Request for Translation

2014-07-03 Thread Ludwig Hügelschäfer
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On 03.07.14 07:48, Kosuke Kaizuka wrote: You mean to change to pool.sks-keyservers.net, keys.gnupg.net, pgp.mit.edu? Good choice. These were the keyservers which did work when testing this change in january. I'm also considering that

Re: [Enigmail] Request for Translation

2014-07-02 Thread Ludwig Hügelschäfer
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On 01.07.14 21:51, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote: On 06/30/2014 12:01 PM, Patrick Brunschwig wrote: On 30.06.14 12:49, Kosuke Kaizuka wrote: - enigmail.keyservers.sample does not include pool.sks-keyservers.net Yes, we removed it. why? the

Re: [Enigmail] Request for Translation

2014-07-01 Thread Patrick Brunschwig
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 30.06.14 18:39, Kosuke Kaizuka wrote: -- enigmail.seeAccountSettings.label says (see Account Settings - OpenPGP Security) 2. help/messenger.html - line 31 and 33 do not follow re-labeling OpenPGP to Enigmail - line 46 Enigmail -gt;

Re: [Enigmail] Request for Translation

2014-06-30 Thread Kosuke Kaizuka
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Hi Patrick, I have found several problems of locale files. 1. enigmail.dtd - - enigmail.keyservers.sample does not include pool.sks-keyservers.net - - enigmail.amPrefTitle.label OpenPGP Options should be OpenPGP Security - -- The title in the

Re: [Enigmail] Request for Translation

2014-06-30 Thread Kosuke Kaizuka
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On 30.06.14 12:49, Kosuke Kaizuka wrote: Hi Patrick, I have found several problems of locale files. 1. enigmail.dtd - enigmail.keyservers.sample does not include pool.sks-keyservers.net Yes, we removed it. -