On Mon, Aug 02, 2004 at 10:26:42PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I=92ve been following the project lately. It looks like the almost only d=
> ocs
> at the moment are the doxygen-generated ones. Are the EFL docs reaching a
> =93stable=94 status? Are there more/newer docs ? I might help with some
On Fri, 06 Aug 2004 10:17:19 +1000, Nick Blievers said:
> I dont disagree that a simple GUI editor should be the default but lets do it
> the Unix way, and
> have an EDITOR variable set. Else we end up with yet another way of setting the
> default editor.
This loses big time for those peop
On Friday 06 August 2004 06:04 am, Andreas Volz wrote:
> Another question. Do E related projects use a special documentation
> licence? I don't know if BSD style licence covers also documentation? If
> not I choose the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL).
BSD can cover documentation
but why cho
Am Thu, 5 Aug 2004 23:58:28 +0200 schrieb Andreas Volz:
> I'm still not sure how to create the documentation. Currently I prefer
> yelp (gnome-help) for it. And then for people without Gnome convert
> all to HTML and invoke a browser to view the help. If you've a better
> idea how to create user d
