On Thursday, 21 October 2004, at 02:58:12 (+0200),
Marco wrote:
> even better, alloca :)
Please be kidding.
Michael
--
Michael Jennings (a.k.a. KainX) http://www.kainx.org/ <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
n + 1, Inc., http://www.nplus1.net/ Author, Eterm (www.eterm.org)
---
Mike Frysinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Wednesday 20 October 2004 07:15 pm, Michael Jennings wrote:
> > On Wednesday, 20 October 2004, at 14:53:05 (-0700),
> >
> > E CVS List wrote:
> > > - chars[1024], *names[ENLIGHTENMENT_CONF_NUM_DESKTOPS];
> > > + char
On Wednesday 20 October 2004 07:15 pm, Michael Jennings wrote:
> On Wednesday, 20 October 2004, at 14:53:05 (-0700),
>
> E CVS List wrote:
> > - chars[1024], *names[ENLIGHTENMENT_CONF_NUM_DESKTOPS];
> > + chars[1024], *names[Conf.desks.num];
>
> I don't believe t
On Wednesday, 20 October 2004, at 14:53:05 (-0700),
E CVS List wrote:
> - chars[1024], *names[ENLIGHTENMENT_CONF_NUM_DESKTOPS];
> + chars[1024], *names[Conf.desks.num];
I don't believe this is legal. You'll need to use malloc().
Michael
--
Michael Jennings
