[E-devel] Spec file(s) patche

2005-01-06 Thread Jason Williams
I was messing around with the CVS code last night and got all the stuff to build for e17/apps/e. Attached is a spec file for the libs and such so that you can easily build the RPMS for them. The only thing that probably should be committed is the change for freetype in the evas package. On

[E-devel] Doxygen small start

2005-01-06 Thread till varoquaux
I decided I might give it a try at commenting e 17. This about the first time I deal with C and I have never used doxygen before. I'd like someone to review my patch and tell me if it can be of any use (or if I'm just wasting my time). Comments and constructive feedback are welcomed. If my

Re: [E-devel] Spec file(s) patche

2005-01-06 Thread Michael Jennings
On Thursday, 06 January 2005, at 09:01:31 (-0500), Jason Williams wrote: I was messing around with the CVS code last night and got all the stuff to build for e17/apps/e. Attached is a spec file for the libs and such so that you can easily build the RPMS for them. The only thing that

[E-devel] Odd chown assignment in e16.8.0 themes

2005-01-06 Thread Peter Hyman
make install in e/themes is perhaps incorrect in that it tries and assign a group equal to the themes install directory. This, of course, cannot work. e/themes/Makefile.am install-data-local: $(mkinstalldirs) $(THEME_DIR) for tf in $(THEME_FILES); do \ gzip -d -c

Re: [E-devel] Odd chown assignment in e16.8.0 themes

2005-01-06 Thread Kim Woelders
See thread: http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/message.php?msg_id=6022045. I have regularly considered expanding the *.etheme's into plain CVS trees. That should bypass the problem entirely. IMO, archiving the .etheme's as such goes against the whole purpose of CVS anyway. /Kim Peter Hyman wrote:

Re: [E-devel] Odd chown assignment in e16.8.0 themes

2005-01-06 Thread Michael Jennings
On Thursday, 06 January 2005, at 14:44:10 (-0500), Peter Hyman wrote: Precisely the point. Because no group is set, a default is assigned. That is wrong. If you're root, yes. As a user, no. In any event, proper packaging results in this not mattering one wit because the packaging

Re: [E-devel] imlib2 xpm buffer overflow

2005-01-06 Thread Vincent Torri
On Tue, 4 Jan 2005, Carsten Haitzler wrote: On Sun, 12 Dec 2004 23:41:16 -0500 Laurence J. Lane [EMAIL PROTECTED] babbled: The xpm buffer overflow reported for imlib also appears to affect imlib2. You can read the details at: http://bugs.debian.org/285138 (a bit slow thanks to xmas and