[E-devel] Standards are good !

2005-06-06 Thread Stephen Horner
In the spirit of the Linux kernel (/usr/src/linux/scripts/Lindent), I am submitting this script that took me nearly two months to finish (j/k). Its goal is to provide a clear definition on how to format ones code before submission. Whether you like it or is irrelevant; I for one hate this style,

[E-devel] Eterm SSE2 patch for x86_64

2005-06-06 Thread John Ellson
Michael, Tres asked me to help with the configure.in and Makefile.am bits for his SSE2 code for x86_64. I've attached patches against Eterm CVS with changes to: configure.in, src/Makefile.am, src/pixmap.c, and the new file: src/sse2_cmod.c (changed since Tres's earlier version) The

[e-devel] ewl_progressbar, some new features

2005-06-06 Thread ilLogict
Hello! While playing with some progressbars, I found myself dreaming about some missing features... So I coded them :p - First I added a char *label_format to struct Ewl_Progressbar, it is set to %3$.0lf%% at initialization, to keep the default percentage mode, as I changed label arguments to

RE: [e-devel] ewl_progressbar, some new features

2005-06-06 Thread dan sinclair
Hello, Few comments on the patch. - Any reason why you commented out a bunch of the tests? - Should use const for the char * parameters. - if this does the same thing as the custom label, i'd be preferable to just use the custom label stuff instead of creating all new routines. - if you have

Re: [E-devel] Re: libast from Eterm CVS fails to build with gcc4 on x86_64

2005-06-06 Thread Michael Jennings
On Thursday, 02 June 2005, at 15:56:40 (-0400), John Ellson wrote: RCS file: /cvsroot/enlightenment/eterm/libast/configure.in,v retrieving revision 1.24 Got it, thanks. On Thursday, 02 June 2005, at 16:02:00 (-0400), Mike Frysinger wrote: would an ifdef like: #if STRICT_ISO_C99 ||

[E-devel] Patch for eclair shuffle

2005-06-06 Thread Kevin Webb
Enlightenment developers, I couldn't find a mailing list or website specific to eclair, so I'm sending the patch here. I apologize if this is the wrong place... As the name would imply, the patch adds playlist shuffling to eclair. -- Kevin Webb Computer Science Georgia Institute of Technology

Re: [E-devel] Re: libast from Eterm CVS fails to build with gcc4 on x86_64

2005-06-06 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Monday 06 June 2005 07:09 pm, Tres Melton wrote: The nop is just an easy way to place markers in the code so you can find the interesting parts quickly. In reality it costs one clock cycle for each nop. i use asm label tricks: $ cat test.c int main(int argc, char *argv[]) { int a;

Re: [E-devel] Eterm SSE2 patch for x86_64

2005-06-06 Thread Tres Melton
On Mon, 2005-06-06 at 11:28 -0400, John Ellson wrote: All credit for the sse2_cmod.c code goes to Tres. I just did the easy bits. Thanks, but the real credit goes to Willem Monsuwe [EMAIL PROTECTED] for writing the original MMX code. All I did was expand it to use all 128 bits of the xmm

[E-devel] E17 Debuging

2005-06-06 Thread Arlo
(I forgot to switch to my subscribed email address when sending this message so hopefully there isn't a duplicate message later if a moderator passes it) I'm curious how other people attach a debugger to E17. Currently I've made a X11 session which looks like this. Eterm -e startx -- :1 sleep 6

Re: [E-devel] E17 Debuging

2005-06-06 Thread The Rasterman
On Mon, 06 Jun 2005 20:09:43 -0700 Arlo [EMAIL PROTECTED] babbled: (I forgot to switch to my subscribed email address when sending this message so hopefully there isn't a duplicate message later if a moderator passes it) I'm curious how other people attach a debugger to