On Thu, 1 Sep 2005 02:10:26 -0400 Michael Jennings <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> babbled:
> On Thursday, 01 September 2005, at 08:28:17 (+0900),
> Carsten Haitzler wrote:
>
> > > well, as you can see, some distro's like to clamp down on RPATH's (for
> > > whatever reasons/policies/boredom)
> > >
> > > so
On 9/1/05, Michael Jennings <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thursday, 01 September 2005, at 08:28:17 (+0900),
> Carsten Haitzler wrote:
>
> > > well, as you can see, some distro's like to clamp down on RPATH's (for
> > > whatever reasons/policies/boredom)
> > >
> > > so Eterm is going to be change
On Wednesday, 31 August 2005, at 18:08:01 (-0400),
Mike Frysinger wrote:
> Index: configure.in
> ===
> RCS file: /cvsroot/enlightenment/eterm/Eterm/configure.in,v
> retrieving revision 1.93
> diff -u -p -r1.93 configure.in
...
Looks
On Wed, 31 Aug 2005 21:00:49 -0700 Reza Naima <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> babbled:
> First off, the build order is wrong on www.enlightenment.org, the order
> should be :
>
> # imlib
> # edb
> # eet
> # evas
> # ecore
> # epeg
> # embryo
> # edje
> # epsilon
> # esmart
> # emotion
> # etox
> # ewl
>
>
On Thursday, 01 September 2005, at 08:28:17 (+0900),
Carsten Haitzler wrote:
> > well, as you can see, some distro's like to clamp down on RPATH's (for
> > whatever reasons/policies/boredom)
> >
> > so Eterm is going to be changed, it'd just be nice if we could do it with a
> > simple ./configu
First off, the build order is wrong on www.enlightenment.org, the order
should be :
# imlib
# edb
# eet
# evas
# ecore
# epeg
# embryo
# edje
# epsilon
# esmart
# emotion
# etox
# ewl
Secondly, e17 is the coolest thing I've seen in a long long time.
Great Job, now work faster! ;)
Third, a
On Thu, 01 Sep 2005 04:50:13 +0200 Sebastian Dransfeld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
babbled:
>
> #ifndef __imlib_TrimLoaderList, since with it in Cygwin, imlib2
> # can't
> find the modules
> >>>
> >>>going by the comment, this looks like a bug in cygwin ? what files does
> >>>it co
#ifndef __imlib_TrimLoaderList, since with it in Cygwin, imlib2
can't
find the modules
going by the comment, this looks like a bug in cygwin ? what files does
it consult if you try to do dlopen("libfoo") ?
In Cygwin, the imlib2 modules are called bumpmap.dll, colormod.dll,
On Wednesday 31 August 2005 10:50 pm, Sebastian Dransfeld wrote:
> #ifndef __imlib_TrimLoaderList, since with it in Cygwin, imlib2
> can't
> find the modules
> >>>
> >>>going by the comment, this looks like a bug in cygwin ? what files does
> >>>it consult if you try to do
On Wednesday 31 August 2005 05:44 pm, Yaakov S wrote:
> Mike Frysinger wrote:
> >>* src/lib/Makefile.am, src/modules/filters/Makefile.am,
> >>src/modules/loaders/Makefile.am:
> >>add '-no-undefined' to *_la_LDFLAGS;
> >
> > whats the point of this ?
>
> If this is absent, libtool refuses to bui
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Mike Frysinger wrote:
>>* src/lib/Makefile.am, src/modules/filters/Makefile.am,
>>src/modules/loaders/Makefile.am:
>> add '-no-undefined' to *_la_LDFLAGS;
>
> whats the point of this ?
If this is absent, libtool refuses to build shared libraries
Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
> On Thu, 01 Sep 2005 11:06:50 +1200 jochen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> babbled:
>
>
>>Hi guys,
>>I encountered a kind of weird think with synaptic debians gui for apt.
>>when synaptic creates a dialog window, eg the summary window when
>>applying changes, it does
On Thu, 01 Sep 2005 11:06:50 +1200 jochen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> babbled:
> Hi guys,
> I encountered a kind of weird think with synaptic debians gui for apt.
> when synaptic creates a dialog window, eg the summary window when
> applying changes, it does not show up in the ALT-TAB windowlist. However
On Thu, 01 Sep 2005 10:20:52 +1200 jochen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> babbled:
> Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
> > On Wed, 31 Aug 2005 14:08:34 +1200 jochen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > babbled:
> >
> >
> >>I just had e segfault on me. Unfortunatly I don't really now what I did
> >>when it happened
On Wed, 31 Aug 2005 18:08:01 -0400 Mike Frysinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> babbled:
> On Wednesday 31 August 2005 10:23 am, Michael Jennings wrote:
> > On Wednesday, 31 August 2005, at 01:43:47 (-0400),
> >
> > Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > > it makes a difference to us distro maintainers who wish to remov
On Wed, 31 Aug 2005 21:38:53 +0200 "Michael 'Mickey' Lauer"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> babbled:
> Hi,
>
> is there any special reason except "no one needed/coded them yet" for
> Gradients and Lines being unavailable as Edje parts? I for one would
> think especially gradients would be pretty helpful.
i
Hi guys,
I encountered a kind of weird think with synaptic debians gui for apt.
when synaptic creates a dialog window, eg the summary window when
applying changes, it does not show up in the ALT-TAB windowlist. However
it shows up in the menu window list. Now I don't know if this is
actually e's pr
On Wednesday 31 August 2005 10:23 am, Michael Jennings wrote:
> On Wednesday, 31 August 2005, at 01:43:47 (-0400),
>
> Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > it makes a difference to us distro maintainers who wish to remove it
>
> To what end? What do you hope to accomplish? What does removing it
> gain you t
Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
> On Wed, 31 Aug 2005 14:08:34 +1200 jochen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> babbled:
>
>
>>I just had e segfault on me. Unfortunatly I don't really now what I did
>>when it happened I was working with glade-2. Well here is the backtrace
>>anyway. If it happens again I'
I've found that the EFL Cookbook in CVS has been quite useful. (Don't tell
my boss but I emailed it to myself @ work so I could read it when I get
bored :) I've never used CVS before so I was glad that the commands to get
a snapshot were right there on the enlightenment.org web site :) I've just
Ok, so I want to do E applications. As simple as that lol.
I have some knowledge of C/C++, I can make basic console-apps atleast.
How do you recommend me to move on?
Any good guides you've used?
I understand I should move onto the EWL Cookbook ASAP. But question is
what I need before that. Becau
Hi,
is there any special reason except "no one needed/coded them yet" for
Gradients and Lines being unavailable as Edje parts? I for one would
think especially gradients would be pretty helpful.
--
Regards,
Mickey.
--
Dipl.-Inf. Mi
On Thursday, 01 September 2005, at 00:15:48 (+0900),
Carsten Haitzler wrote:
> oh PHEW! :) thank god! :)
Oh ye of little faith. You must trust in the JBJ! He is wise and
all-knowing! :-)
Michael
--
Michael Jennings (a.k.a. KainX) http://www.kainx.org/ <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
n + 1, Inc., http
this problem happens because aclocal cannot find libast.m4. Just find
libast.m4 and make a link to it in /usr/share/aclocal
В ср, 2005-08-31 в 02:19 -0300, Matias Aguirre написа:
> Hi all.
> I try to compile Eterm and the configure return this error:
> checking for seteuid... yes
> checking for me
On Wednesday, 31 August 2005, at 10:47:28 (-0400),
Jim Perrin wrote:
> In any event I had some time to sit down and read the link Didier
> posted, and I don't see how it hurts anything to spell out the
> Requires. It might be redundant, but that would be about it.
Well, you must also consider the
On 8/31/05, Michael Jennings <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wednesday, 31 August 2005, at 16:25:14 (+0900),
> Carsten Haitzler wrote:
> >
> > weird. its a build requires. it should not think this. this is not a good
> > thing
> > imho. can you turn it OFF? a BUILD may require edje-devel but runti
On 8/31/05, Jim Perrin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[SNIP]
> In any event I had some time to sit down and read the link Didier
> posted, and I don't see how it hurts anything to spell out the
> Requires. It might be redundant, but that would be about it.
My whole point is summarized in one sentenc
On Wed, 31 Aug 2005 10:12:37 -0400 Michael Jennings <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> babbled:
> No, it's not a good thing. Fortunately, it's not true either. :-)
oh PHEW! :) thank god! :)
> > hmm rpm has gone downhill - this above is bad imho. there are cases
> > where it will be wrong.
>
> Then it's a go
On 8/31/05, Jim Perrin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > RHEL/CentOS are not designed to build in a chroot.
> >
> > Fortunately I build all my packages in a clean chroot for cAos, so I
> > know they work. You can find build logs, packages, and
> > post-dependency package lists for each package at, e.
> RHEL/CentOS are not designed to build in a chroot.
>
> Fortunately I build all my packages in a clean chroot for cAos, so I
> know they work. You can find build logs, packages, and
> post-dependency package lists for each package at, e.g.,
> http://mirror.caosity.org/cAos-2/ext/autobuilder/i386
On Wednesday, 31 August 2005, at 01:43:47 (-0400),
Mike Frysinger wrote:
> it makes a difference to us distro maintainers who wish to remove it
To what end? What do you hope to accomplish? What does removing it
gain you that makes it worth the effort (not to mention the added
configure/Makefile
On Wednesday, 31 August 2005, at 07:29:42 (-0400),
Jim Perrin wrote:
> Actually that's good to know and thanks for pointing it out. I've
> been doing things the other either for habit or because I picked up
> the incorrect method somewhere along the line. In any event, I think
> things are far eno
On Wednesday, 31 August 2005, at 16:25:14 (+0900),
Carsten Haitzler wrote:
> > e.g if you state that package X:
> >
> > BuildRequires: edje-devel
> >
> > Only stating this would imply for a tool like yum/apt to automatically
> > download edje for RUNNING the application.
> >
> > i.e if you type
>
> Maybe I expressed myself wrongly or wass too quick at writing something.
>
> RPM has very good capabilities of automatically finding dependencies
> for libraries.
>
> e.g if you state that package X:
>
> BuildRequires: edje-devel
>
> Only stating this would imply for a tool like yum/apt to
So i Won't be building e too.
I'm gonna "re"take my 2003 old build of e17 who work
perfectly...( xawdecode work, mouse copy/paste work
also ) and wait for a new release ...
--- Carsten Haitzler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit :
> On Mon, 29 Aug 2005 20:56:40 +0200 (CEST) zol
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ba
On Wed, 2005-08-31 at 16:25 +0900, Carsten Haitzler wrote:
> On Wed, 31 Aug 2005 14:29:58 +0800 Didier Casse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> babbled:
> > e.g if you state that package X:
> >
> > BuildRequires: edje-devel
> >
> > Only stating this would imply for a tool like yum/apt to automatically
> > dow
On Wed, 31 Aug 2005 14:29:58 +0800 Didier Casse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
babbled:
> On 8/31/05, The Rasterman Carsten Haitzler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Wed, 31 Aug 2005 12:02:26 +0800 Didier Casse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > babbled:
> >
> > > On 8/29/05, Jim Perrin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
37 matches
Mail list logo
