On Sunday, 28 May 2006, at 19:46:28 (+0100),
Andrew Williams wrote:
> should the ewl .spec not cover this? Am I missing something
> important?
No, you are correct. I've made the appropriate change to the spec
file.
Michael
--
Michael Jennings (a.k.a. KainX) http://www.kainx.org/ <[EMAIL PRO
On Sun, May 28, 2006 at 04:00:14PM +0200, Grzegorz Andrelczyk wrote:
> Hello.
>
> There is dependency problem in Imlib2 and Imlib2_loadres. Both packages
> are set to depend on xlibs-dev, but xlibs-dev is depreceated. Even worse
> xlibs-dev was removed from repositoris probably during transition t
should the ewl .spec not cover this? Am I missing something important?
On Sun, 2006-05-28 at 14:31 -0400, Michael Jennings wrote:
> On Sunday, 28 May 2006, at 17:47:28 (+0100),
> Andrew Williams wrote:
>
> > emotion? engage should not depend on emotion, surely?
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~/cvs/caos/g
On Sunday, 28 May 2006, at 17:47:28 (+0100),
Andrew Williams wrote:
> emotion? engage should not depend on emotion, surely?
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~/cvs/caos/groups/e/engage >> rpm -qR engage | grep emotion
libemotion.so.0
I believe EWL pulls in emotion. But it's definitely linking against
it.
Mi
emotion? engage should not depend on emotion, surely?
On Sun, 2006-05-28 at 01:36 -0400, Enlightenment CVS wrote:
> Enlightenment CVS committal
>
> Author : mej
> Project : misc
> Module : engage
>
> Dir : misc/engage
>
>
> Modified Files:
> engage.spec
>
>
> Log Message:
> Sun
Hello.
There is dependency problem in Imlib2 and Imlib2_loadres. Both packages
are set to depend on xlibs-dev, but xlibs-dev is depreceated. Even worse
xlibs-dev was removed from repositoris probably during transition to
Xorg 7.0. At least it looks like that. Now there is one package x-dev,
and a
On Sat, 27 May 2006 22:56:23 -0400 Michael Jennings <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> babbled:
> On Sunday, 28 May 2006, at 09:37:53 (+0900),
> Carsten Haitzler wrote:
>
> > hmmm - are you sure?
>
> Absolutely positive. The build failed with a message about
> /usr/lib/evas/modules/loaders/edb/linux-gnu-i686
On Sun, 28 May 2006 11:07:20 +0200 Kim Woelders <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> babbled:
> David Seikel wrote:
> > I went on a .cvsignore updating spree today. Not a lot to do in e17,
> > e_modules and misc, so I looked at the others in our cvs. devs should
> > never need any, eterm is good, but e16 needs s
On Sun, 28 May 2006 11:07:20 +0200 Kim Woelders <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> David Seikel wrote:
> > I went on a .cvsignore updating spree today. Not a lot to do in
> > e17, e_modules and misc, so I looked at the others in our cvs.
> > devs should never need any, eterm is good, but e16 needs
> >
David Seikel wrote:
I went on a .cvsignore updating spree today. Not a lot to do in e17,
e_modules and misc, so I looked at the others in our cvs. devs should
never need any, eterm is good, but e16 needs some .cvsignore loving.
I had problems compiling e16/imlib, so I would not be able to upda
10 matches
Mail list logo
