On Tue, 6 Mar 2007 00:40:44 -0500 Michael Jennings [EMAIL PROTECTED] babbled:
On Tuesday, 06 March 2007, at 05:06:04 (+),
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well, that's probably too drastic. It's still really an
optionally compiled, loadable module, and raster's last mods seem
to have
On Mon, Mar 05, 2007 at 11:02:27PM -0600, Nick Hughart wrote:
Hi, I think you had posted a link to your in progress e_dbus code, but
I was wondering if you could post it again. I not quite sure how done
it is, but would like to use it in a project I'm doing and in the
process hopefully find
Why not just file a bug?
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/browse.cgi?product=librsvg
(I can do that for you, I have an account in GNOME's bugzilla, just
let me know if you want)
I am one of those who really want and need SVG support in E. I am
using EFM and I'm often browsing the dirs with my vector
Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
unfortunately - we have issues like fdo menus and icon specs that REQUIRE svg
support... :(:(:( big problems :( i could do something like fork of a child
process that converts via a pipe - at least if it dies the parent won't, and
we
will hit a
On Tue, 06 Mar 2007 09:57:55 -0500 dan sinclair [EMAIL PROTECTED] babbled:
Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
unfortunately - we have issues like fdo menus and icon specs that REQUIRE
svg support... :(:(:( big problems :( i could do something like fork of a
child process that
On Tuesday, 06 March 2007, at 07:57:19 (+),
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Unfortunately, SVG is here and many want it. librsvg is probably the
'best' way to go about this right now.
*sigh* Same as gettext. It's like...wait for it...wait for it...
Deja GNU.
However, there's no reason why
On Tuesday, 06 March 2007, at 19:41:59 (+0900),
Carsten Haitzler wrote:
ooh no - i didn't actually fix any leak. i added the close call
HOPING it'd fix the leak - it didn't.
Ah, okay. I misunderstood then.
but it doesn't make me feel any better about the quality of the code
for what is not
