On Fri, 25 Jan 2008, Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Friday 25 January 2008, Vincent Torri wrote:
--- src/lib/Eet_private.h 29 Sep 2007 09:21:43 - 1.17
+++ src/lib/Eet_private.h 26 Jan 2008 00:04:53 -
+#ifdef __CEGCC__
+# include windows.h
+# define HAVE_BOOLEAN
+# define
#ifdef HAVE_NETINET_IN_H
-#include netinet/in.h
-#elif _WIN32
-#include winsock2.h
+# include netinet/in.h
+#endif
+#ifdef HAVE_WINSOCK2_H
+# include winsock2.h
#endif
it is completely useless to check it in configure script as winsowk2.h is
always avalaible on windows. So you replace
On Sat, 26 Jan 2008, Vincent Torri wrote:
#ifdef HAVE_NETINET_IN_H
-#include netinet/in.h
-#elif _WIN32
-#include winsock2.h
+# include netinet/in.h
+#endif
+#ifdef HAVE_WINSOCK2_H
+# include winsock2.h
#endif
it is completely useless to check it in configure script as winsowk2.h
On Fri, Jan 25, 2008 at 07:43:47AM -0300, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri wrote:
On Jan 25, 2008 12:40 AM, The Rasterman Carsten Haitzler
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 25 Jan 2008 00:11:41 -0300 Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
[EMAIL PROTECTED] babbled:
On Jan 24, 2008 11:42 PM, Nathan Ingersoll
On Saturday 26 January 2008, Vincent Torri wrote:
On Sat, 26 Jan 2008, Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Saturday 26 January 2008, Vincent Torri wrote:
#ifdef HAVE_NETINET_IN_H
-#include netinet/in.h
-#elif _WIN32
-#include winsock2.h
+# include netinet/in.h
+#endif
+#ifdef HAVE_WINSOCK2_H
On Saturday 26 January 2008, Vincent Torri wrote:
#ifdef HAVE_NETINET_IN_H
-#include netinet/in.h
-#elif _WIN32
-#include winsock2.h
+# include netinet/in.h
+#endif
+#ifdef HAVE_WINSOCK2_H
+# include winsock2.h
#endif
it is completely useless to check it in configure script as
On Sat, 26 Jan 2008, Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Saturday 26 January 2008, Vincent Torri wrote:
#ifdef HAVE_NETINET_IN_H
-#include netinet/in.h
-#elif _WIN32
-#include winsock2.h
+# include netinet/in.h
+#endif
+#ifdef HAVE_WINSOCK2_H
+# include winsock2.h
#endif
it is completely
On Sat, 26 Jan 2008, Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Saturday 26 January 2008, Vincent Torri wrote:
On Sat, 26 Jan 2008, Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Saturday 26 January 2008, Vincent Torri wrote:
#ifdef HAVE_NETINET_IN_H
-#include netinet/in.h
-#elif _WIN32
-#include winsock2.h
+# include
On Sat, 26 Jan 2008, Enlightenment CVS wrote:
+#ifdef _WIN32F
^
is it a typo ?
Vincent
-
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
On Saturday 26 January 2008, Vincent Torri wrote:
On Sat, 26 Jan 2008, Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Saturday 26 January 2008, Vincent Torri wrote:
On Sat, 26 Jan 2008, Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Saturday 26 January 2008, Vincent Torri wrote:
#ifdef HAVE_NETINET_IN_H
-#include netinet/in.h
exactly ... where we can unify these pieces without touching common code the
better. not sure if there's a core piece of e17 where we can move all of
this, but if we had a few files that we could just drop into the different e
libraries, that'd be a good start i think (think gnulib here).
nash schrieb:
On Fri, 2008-01-25 at 13:28 -0500, Enlightenment CVS wrote:
Enlightenment CVS committal
Author : pfritz
Project : e17
Module : libs/ecore
===
RCS file: /cvs/e/e17/libs/ecore/src/lib/ecore/Ecore.h,v
On Jan 26, 2008 6:13 AM, Lars Munch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Jan 25, 2008 at 07:43:47AM -0300, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri wrote:
On Jan 25, 2008 12:40 AM, The Rasterman Carsten Haitzler
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 25 Jan 2008 00:11:41 -0300 Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
[EMAIL
Build log for Enlightenment DR 0.17 on 2008-01-26 07:08:42 -0800
Build logs are available at http://download.enlightenment.org/tests/logs
Packages that failed to build:
echo http://download.enlightenment.org/tests/logs/echo.log
ecore_li http://download.enlightenment.org/tests/logs/ecore_li.log
On Jan 26, 2008 7:11 AM, Enlightenment CVS
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Enlightenment CVS committal
Author : vapier
Project : e17
Module : libs/ecore
Dir : e17/libs/ecore/src/lib/ecore
Modified Files:
ecore_main.c ecore_private.h
Log Message:
relegate _WIN32 ifdef mess to
On Saturday 26 January 2008, Vincent Torri wrote:
exactly ... where we can unify these pieces without touching common code
the better. not sure if there's a core piece of e17 where we can move
all of this, but if we had a few files that we could just drop into the
different e libraries,
On Sat, 26 Jan 2008, Mike Frysinger wrote:
I've tried to use gnulib once, for the port of the linux functions. It's a
pain to install and to use. I'll never touch that beast anymore :)
it can be a beast, that's for sure. i'm not advocating the complexity there,
just the idea: little
On Saturday 26 January 2008, Vincent Torri wrote:
On Sat, 26 Jan 2008, Mike Frysinger wrote:
I've tried to use gnulib once, for the port of the linux functions. It's
a pain to install and to use. I'll never touch that beast anymore :)
it can be a beast, that's for sure. i'm not
I checked the man page for Mac OS X as well. Looks like pselect()
comes from FreeBSD in that case.
On Jan 26, 2008 9:09 AM, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jan 26, 2008 6:13 AM, Lars Munch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Jan 25, 2008 at 07:43:47AM -0300, Gustavo
Typo on frequently.
On Jan 26, 2008 6:23 AM, Enlightenment CVS
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+pFrecuently updated tutorials and guides for both users and developers./p
-
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all
Hi all,
Trying to get this transition to work. I want this image to change to
the other image... Im just not sure if i can do that with
etk/progress_bar... Is there a way to find out if these things are
possible? I was flicking through the source code for the progress bar
in etk and saw the part
21 matches
Mail list logo
