are you sure that you have updated recently eet ? Because all those
problems have already been fixed
Vincent
On Sat, 15 Nov 2008, Thiago Marcos P. Santos wrote:
Third patch: fixed conflicting prototypes.
On Sat, Nov 15, 2008 at 4:44 PM, Thiago Marcos P. Santos <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Third patch: fixed conflicting prototypes.
On Sat, Nov 15, 2008 at 4:44 PM, Thiago Marcos P. Santos <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> First patch: s/cypher/cipher/g in some files.
> Second patch: renames eet/src/lib/eet_cypher.c to eet/src/lib/eet_cipher.c.
>
> Both words are correct, but cipher is m
First patch: s/cypher/cipher/g in some files.
Second patch: renames eet/src/lib/eet_cypher.c to eet/src/lib/eet_cipher.c.
Both words are correct, but cipher is more common. IMO we should adopt
cipher.
See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cipher.
BR,
diff --git a/eet/src/lib/eet_cypher.c b/eet/src/lib
On Sat, Nov 15, 2008 at 10:17 AM, The Rasterman Carsten Haitzler
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, 15 Nov 2008 13:07:27 +0100 "Michael 'Mickey' Lauer"
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> babbled:
>
>> A global precicion switch sounds much too broad to me, since we will never
>> find a precision that will plea
On Sat, 15 Nov 2008 13:07:27 +0100 "Michael 'Mickey' Lauer"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> babbled:
> A global precicion switch sounds much too broad to me, since we will never
> find a precision that will please all use-cases in parallel. Couldn't you do
> it as glib does? (timeout_add, timeout_add_second
A global precicion switch sounds much too broad to me, since we will never
find a precision that will please all use-cases in parallel. Couldn't you do
it as glib does? (timeout_add, timeout_add_seconds).
--
:M:
-
This SF.
